All articles tagged with #time restricted eating
Originally Published 5 days ago — by ScienceAlert
A recent study questions the benefits of time-restricted intermittent fasting on metabolic and cardiovascular health, suggesting that calorie reduction, rather than timing, may be the key factor in health improvements. The study found no significant changes in health markers despite weight loss, highlighting the importance of calorie intake over fasting schedules.
Originally Published 6 months ago — by Daily Mail
A study suggests that practicing mindfulness and eating within an eight-hour window can reduce risk factors associated with the rising incidence of colon cancer among young Americans, especially those with obesity and high stress, by lowering inflammation, weight, and improving metabolic health.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by Medical Xpress
A meta-analysis by Bond University researchers suggests that meal timing strategies, such as time-restricted eating and reducing meal frequency, are linked to modest weight loss over 12 weeks. The study, published in JAMA Network Open, reviewed 29 trials with 2,485 adults and found small weight reductions associated with these strategies. However, the clinical significance remains unclear due to potential biases and limitations in the studies. Further research with larger samples and standardized methods is recommended to better understand the long-term effects.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by Ars Technica
A study published in Annals of Internal Medicine suggests that time-restricted eating (TRE) may help people lose weight simply because it leads to reduced calorie intake, rather than through complex metabolic changes. The small study involved 41 participants and found that those following a time-restricted diet lost about the same amount of weight as those eating the same diet without time restrictions. The study's limitations include its small size and the specific demographics of the participants, but it provides valuable data on the mechanisms of TRE and its potential as a simplified and accessible dietary strategy for weight loss.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by NBC News
A new study from Johns Hopkins University suggests that the effectiveness of time-restricted eating for weight loss may be due to reduced calorie intake rather than the timing itself. The small trial, which provided prepared meals to participants, found similar weight loss results for both time-restricted and regular eating schedules when calorie intake was controlled. While some experts believe meal timing matters for weight loss, others argue that time-restricted eating may offer benefits beyond weight loss, such as improving cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood sugar levels. However, conflicting research suggests potential long-term risks, and the study's controlled environment may not fully reflect real-life scenarios.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by New York Post
A study presented at the American Heart Association’s conference suggests that time-restricted eating, a form of intermittent fasting, may be linked to a 91% higher risk of cardiovascular death. The study analyzed data from 20,000 adults and found that those who ate within an eight-hour window had the highest risk, followed by those who ate within an eight to 10-hour window. However, experts caution that the study has limitations and does not prove causation, emphasizing the need for further research and personalized nutrition advice for those considering time-restricted eating.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by Fox News
A study published by the American Heart Association suggests that time-restricted eating, a form of intermittent fasting, may be linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular death. Adults following an eight-hour eating schedule were found to have a 91% higher risk of dying from heart disease compared to those spreading out their meals over 12 to 16 hours. However, experts caution that the study has limitations, including reliance on self-reported data and lack of information on participants' complete diets and lifestyle factors. They advise individuals with medical conditions to consult with a healthcare professional before starting any restrictive diet.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by ScienceAlert
A new study warns that time-restricted eating (TRE), a form of intermittent fasting, may be linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and early death. The study found that restricting eating to an 8-hour window or less was associated with a 91% higher risk of death due to cardiovascular disease, particularly among those with heart disease or cancer. While some celebrities promote TRE for weight loss, the study suggests that focusing on what people eat may be more important than when they eat, and calls for a more cautious, personalized approach to dietary recommendations aligned with an individual's health status and the latest scientific evidence.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by SciTechDaily
A study presented at the American Heart Association’s 2024 sessions suggests that following an 8-hour time-restricted eating plan, a form of intermittent fasting, may be linked to a 91% higher risk of cardiovascular mortality. The research, which analyzed data from over 20,000 U.S. adults, found that this eating pattern was associated with an increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease, particularly among individuals with existing heart disease or cancer. While time-restricted eating has been popular for its potential short-term benefits, the study emphasizes the need for a personalized approach to dietary recommendations aligned with an individual's health status and the latest scientific evidence.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by Bored Panda
A new study suggests that following an 8-hour time-restricted eating schedule, a form of intermittent fasting, may be associated with a 91% higher risk of dying from cardiovascular disease. Contrary to previous beliefs about its health benefits, the study found that this eating pattern did not lead to living longer and was not linked to a lower risk of death from any cause. The research emphasizes the need for a personalized approach to dietary recommendations, especially for individuals with existing heart conditions or cancer, and highlights the importance of aligning dietary choices with an individual's health status and the latest scientific evidence.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by Science Daily
Preliminary research presented at the American Heart Association's Epidemiology and Prevention Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Scientific Sessions 2024 suggests that following an 8-hour time-restricted eating plan may be linked to a 91% higher risk of cardiovascular death compared to eating across 12-16 hours per day. The study, which analyzed over 20,000 U.S. adults, found that time-restricted eating did not reduce the overall risk of death from any cause and was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, particularly among those with existing heart disease or cancer. While time-restricted eating has gained popularity for its potential short-term benefits, this research emphasizes the need for a more cautious and personalized approach to dietary recommendations, taking into account an individual's health status and the latest scientific evidence.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by The Washington Post
A new study presented at an American Heart Association meeting suggests that adhering to an eight-hour time-restricted eating plan, a popular form of intermittent fasting, may increase the risk of dying from heart disease. The study analyzed data on 20,000 adults and found that those following this eating pattern had a higher likelihood of heart disease-related mortality, particularly those with existing heart conditions or cancer. The findings raise concerns about the long-term impact of intermittent fasting on heart health and highlight the importance of focusing on overall diet quality rather than just the timing of meals.
Originally Published 1 year ago — by American Heart Association
A study of over 20,000 U.S. adults found that following an 8-hour time-restricted eating schedule, a form of intermittent fasting, was associated with a 91% higher risk of death from cardiovascular disease compared to eating across 12-16 hours per day. The research also revealed an increased risk of cardiovascular death for individuals with heart disease or cancer. While time-restricted eating has been popular for its potential short-term benefits, this study suggests that an 8-hour eating window may not be associated with living longer and encourages a personalized approach to dietary recommendations, particularly for individuals with existing health conditions.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by Medical Xpress
A study conducted at the University of Illinois Chicago suggests that time-restricted eating, also known as intermittent fasting, can be a safe and effective method for weight loss and blood sugar control in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Participants who followed an eight-hour eating window lost more weight over six months than those who reduced calorie intake. Both groups showed similar reductions in long-term blood sugar levels. The study highlights the potential of time-restricted eating as an alternative to traditional dieting for individuals with diabetes. However, further research is needed, and individuals should consult their doctors before starting this type of diet.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by CNN
A randomized clinical trial found that time-restricted eating, where participants limited their eating window to 8 hours per day, was as effective as calorie counting for weight loss and blood sugar improvement in people with type 2 diabetes. Both groups experienced a reduction in weight, improved A1C levels, and lost visceral belly fat. However, experts caution that time-restricted eating is just one tactic and may not work for everyone, emphasizing the importance of overall diet quality and individualized approaches to weight loss. It is recommended to consult with a healthcare professional before trying time-restricted eating, especially for individuals with type 2 diabetes.