Calorie Counting vs. Time-Restricted Eating: What's More Effective for Weight Loss?

TL;DR Summary
A study published in Annals of Internal Medicine suggests that time-restricted eating (TRE) may help people lose weight simply because it leads to reduced calorie intake, rather than through complex metabolic changes. The small study involved 41 participants and found that those following a time-restricted diet lost about the same amount of weight as those eating the same diet without time restrictions. The study's limitations include its small size and the specific demographics of the participants, but it provides valuable data on the mechanisms of TRE and its potential as a simplified and accessible dietary strategy for weight loss.
Topics:health#caloric-restriction#health-and-nutrition#intermittent-fasting#research-study#time-restricted-eating#weight-loss
- It's cutting calories—not intermittent fasting—that drops weight, study suggests Ars Technica
- Why eating within limited hours may help with weight loss NBC News
- Fasting diets not a 'magical' solution for weight loss, study finds The Times
- Is calorie intake or time-restricted eating more important for weight loss? Here's what a new study says. Yahoo Life
- Weight loss: Calorie counting as effective as time-restricted eating Medical News Today
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
88%
798 → 99 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Ars Technica