A randomized clinical trial found that time-restricted eating, where participants limited their eating window to 8 hours per day, was as effective as calorie counting for weight loss and blood sugar improvement in people with type 2 diabetes. Both groups experienced a reduction in weight, improved A1C levels, and lost visceral belly fat. However, experts caution that time-restricted eating is just one tactic and may not work for everyone, emphasizing the importance of overall diet quality and individualized approaches to weight loss. It is recommended to consult with a healthcare professional before trying time-restricted eating, especially for individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Time-restricted eating between noon and 8 p.m. was found to be a more effective weight loss strategy for individuals with type 2 diabetes compared to calorie counting. Both methods improved blood sugar levels. However, professional consultation is advised due to medication concerns. The study suggests that time-restricted eating may offer a simple way to decrease calories and lose weight, but further research is needed to determine its impact on cardiometabolic risk factors.
A study comparing intermittent fasting and calorie counting for weight loss in individuals with type 2 diabetes found that both approaches were effective, with the intermittent fasting group losing about 4.3% of their body weight and the calorie-restriction group losing about 2.5%. The difference between the two groups was not significant, suggesting that one approach is not necessarily better than the other. Adherence to the diet played a role in the percentage difference between the groups. Intermittent fasting may be a viable alternative for individuals struggling with calorie counting, but individual factors such as eating habits and medication should be considered.
New research comparing time-restricted eating (intermittent fasting) to calorie counting for weight loss shows that both strategies produce similar results in a racially diverse population of adults with obesity. Participants in both groups lost about 5% of their body weight after 12 months. However, time-restricted eating showed potential for improving insulin sensitivity. The study suggests that choosing between intermittent fasting and calorie counting should be based on personal preferences and habits. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effectiveness and safety of these weight loss strategies, as well as their potential in managing metabolic diseases.
A recent study suggests that intermittent fasting, specifically time-restricted eating, is as effective as counting calories for weight loss. The yearlong clinical trial involving 90 people with obesity found that time-restricted eating resulted in a 5% weight loss, similar to the group that followed caloric restriction. The study highlights that counting the hours of the eating window may be a viable alternative to counting calories. However, access to dieticians and cognitive behavior strategies is crucial for sustainable weight loss.
A recent study comparing time-restricted eating (intermittent fasting) and calorie restriction for weight control found that while the intermittent fasting group consumed fewer calories, they lost less weight than the calorie-restricted group. However, an expert suggests that the study's focus on weight loss overlooked the importance of food quality and fiber intake. The expert argues that intermittent fasting, when combined with a diverse range of high-quality, fiber-rich, and low-sugar foods, can have beneficial effects on hormones and overall health. Prolonged calorie restriction can lead to hormonal imbalances, increased cravings, stress, and nutritional deficiencies. Intermittent fasting has been shown to benefit the gut microbiome, improve insulin resistance, and allow physiological processes to run more smoothly. To introduce intermittent fasting, it is recommended to start slowly, focus on nutrient-dense foods, and gradually increase plant diversity in the diet.
A study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that intermittent fasting and calorie counting diets resulted in similar weight loss outcomes. Both groups were able to maintain their weight loss after a year. While intermittent fasting may promote mindful eating and simplicity, calorie counting encourages a focus on food. The choice between the two methods depends on individual preferences and past experiences with weight loss efforts. Consulting with a registered dietitian is recommended for personalized guidance.
A recent study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine found that both intermittent fasting and calorie counting produce similar results in terms of weight loss. Intermittent fasting, which involves limiting meals to an eight-hour window, can improve insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism. However, its long-term effectiveness in losing weight is still unclear. The study suggests that individual preferences should be taken into account when recommending a weight loss method, as results varied among participants. Further research is needed to identify who could benefit most from each approach.
A new study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine suggests that time-restricted eating (TRE), a form of intermittent fasting, may be just as effective as calorie counting for weight loss and maintenance. The study found that participants in both the calorie-cutting group and the TRE group lost about 5% of their body weight in the first six months, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. By eliminating six hours of eating time per day, TRE targets prime snack time and may help individuals who struggle with calorie counting. The study also highlighted the importance of dietician consultations and cognitive behavioral therapy in supporting healthy eating habits.
A study conducted by the University of Illinois Chicago found that time-restricted eating (intermittent fasting) and traditional calorie counting led to similar weight loss outcomes among adults with obesity. Participants in the time-restricted eating group consumed fewer calories and lost more weight over a year compared to those who made no changes to their eating habits. Additionally, the study showed that time-restricted eating improved insulin sensitivity. Further research is needed to understand individual responses to each dietary intervention.
A new study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine compared the effectiveness of intermittent fasting (specifically time-restricted eating) and calorie counting for weight loss. The study found that both methods were equally effective in helping participants lose about 5% of their starting body weight in the first six months. The diets were then adjusted to maintain weight loss, and participants in both groups lost about 4% of their starting body weight after 12 months. Both diets also reduced waist circumference and fat mass to a similar extent. However, it's important to note that participants in both groups received substantial counseling and support, which may have influenced the results. The study suggests that intermittent fasting can be a viable option for weight loss, but individual factors may determine its effectiveness for different people.
A new study found that intermittent fasting without counting calories led to about the same amount of weight loss as food tracking and trying to stick to a 25% deficit. The randomized controlled trial assessed 77 individuals with obesity from diverse backgrounds. The researchers said that their study highlights that individual preferences should be taken into account when it comes to approaching weight loss. While fasting can be a good way for some people to lose weight, it doesn't work for everyone.
A new study has found that eight-hour intermittent fasting has similar weight-loss results to calorie counting in adults with obesity. The study compared weight loss in 77 participants who either intermittently fasted, adhered to a calorie-restricted diet, or were in a control group with no eating restrictions. The effect of having less time to eat is thought to lead to the consumption of fewer calories, which is the main reason the approach works. The study was funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health.
Tracking your food about 40% of the time is enough to see results in weight loss, according to a new study by the University of Connecticut and weight loss company WW. Researchers analyzed data from 153 users of the WW app and found that people who tracked their meals and snacks about 70% of the time lost the most weight, around 10% of body weight during the six month study. However, people still lost weight if they started tracking regularly but dropped off a bit over time. The part-time calorie counting group tracked about 40% of days overall and still lost about 5% of their body weight, enough to see significant improvements in health.
A registered dietitian nutritionist at New York University has debunked six popular diets seen on TikTok, warning against the dangers of disordered eating. She advised viewers to avoid calorie counting, chlorophyll water, baby food, the military diet, and the cabbage soup diet. Instead, she recommended focusing on eating more fruits, vegetables, protein, and healthy fats. She also noted that there is no magic solution to weight loss and that sustainable, nutrient-rich diets are key to achieving long-term success.
