Intermittent Fasting vs. Calorie Counting: Which is More Effective for Weight Loss?

A new study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine compared the effectiveness of intermittent fasting (specifically time-restricted eating) and calorie counting for weight loss. The study found that both methods were equally effective in helping participants lose about 5% of their starting body weight in the first six months. The diets were then adjusted to maintain weight loss, and participants in both groups lost about 4% of their starting body weight after 12 months. Both diets also reduced waist circumference and fat mass to a similar extent. However, it's important to note that participants in both groups received substantial counseling and support, which may have influenced the results. The study suggests that intermittent fasting can be a viable option for weight loss, but individual factors may determine its effectiveness for different people.
- Is Intermittent Fasting or Calorie Counting Better For Weight Loss? New Study Weighs in ScienceAlert
- Study: Intermittent fasting as effective as calorie counting WFMJ
- Intermittent Fasting vs. Calorie Counting: What Is Best for Weight Loss According to Science SciTechDaily
- Study finds mice make better distance runners on time-restricted diet Medical Xpress
- Intermittent Fasting as Effective as Calorie Counting for Weight Loss, Study Finds Men's Journal
Reading Insights
0
0
3 min
vs 5 min read
84%
824 → 133 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on ScienceAlert