Tag

Standing

All articles tagged with #standing

law1 month ago•2 min saved

Supreme Court revives GOP challenge to Illinois mail-in ballot rule

The Supreme Court revived Republican Rep. Mike Bost’s challenge to Illinois’s rule allowing mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within two weeks after the election, in a 7-2 decision that focused on standing rather than the constitutionality of the rule. Chief Justice Roberts said candidates have a concrete interest in counting rules and election integrity, while Justice Jackson, joined by Justice Sotomayor, dissented, arguing against granting candidates special standing. The case, which lower courts had dismissed for lack of injury, reflects ongoing partisan battles over mail‑in voting and late-arriving ballots.

via The Guardian|

#election-law #illinois #law

politics1 month ago•4 min saved

Supreme Court Lets Challenge to Illinois’ Late-Ballot Rule Move Forward

SCOTUS, in a 7-2 ruling authored by Chief Justice Roberts, revived Rep. Michael Bost’s challenge to Illinois’ 14-day late-ballot rule, holding that a candidate has a concrete stake and standing to challenge the vote-counting rules. The case is sent back to lower courts for further proceedings; the court did not rule on the law’s legality. Justice Barrett concurred with the outcome but not the reasoning, while Justices Sotomayor and Jackson dissented, warning of broad implications for election litigation.

via CBS News|

#ballot-counting #election-law #illinois

us-politics1 month ago•6 min saved

Court lets candidates challenge late-ballot counting

The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that candidates can sue in advance over vote-counting practices, allowing Rep. Mike Bost to challenge Illinois’ rule that counts ballots postmarked by Election Day if they arrive within two weeks. The decision resolves standing for election disputes—being a candidate suffices—without deciding whether late-arriving ballots violate federal law; Justices Barrett and Kagan concurred, Jackson and Sotomayor dissented, and Mississippi mail-ballot cases remain on the docket.

via Politico|

#ballot-counting #elections #standing

politics1 month ago•312 min saved

Supreme Court opens door to more election challenges with absentee-ballot ruling

The Supreme Court, in a 7-2 decision authored by Chief Justice Roberts, revived Republican Rep. Michael Bost’s challenge to Illinois’ rule allowing mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within two weeks. The court held that candidates have a concrete interest in how votes are counted, potentially broadening standing for election-rule challenges and signaling more post-election litigation; lower courts had dismissed the suit for lack of standing. Dissenters warned the ruling could destabilize elections by inviting chaos and more lawsuits after contested elections.

via CNN|

#absentee-ballots #election-law #politics

law8 months ago•3 min saved

Supreme Court Allows Fuel Companies to Challenge California’s Emission Standards

The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that fuel producers can challenge California's ability to set its own vehicle emissions standards under a federal waiver, focusing on whether they have standing to sue, without addressing the legality of the standards themselves. The decision emphasizes the potential harm to manufacturers from California's regulations, which aim to reduce greenhouse gases and combat climate change, but leaves the merits of the case open for future litigation.

via The New York Times|

#california-emissions #climate-change #fuel-producers

law-and-politics1 year ago•2 min saved

"Supreme Court Justices Express Skepticism on FDA Accountability in Abortion Pill Arguments"

The Supreme Court heard arguments challenging the FDA's relaxed regulations on the abortion pill, with legal experts suggesting the case may be dismissed due to lack of standing. Justices appeared skeptical of the FDA's lack of accountability for any harms caused by the pill, with Justice Alito questioning the FDA's infallibility and whether anyone can sue in such cases. The questioning may indicate the justices' thinking on who has standing in such matters, with implications for future legal challenges.

via Fox News|

#abortion-pill #fda #law-and-politics

law-and-politics1 year ago•5 min saved

"Supreme Court's Impact on Abortion Medication Rules Under Scrutiny"

The Supreme Court appears likely to uphold access to the abortion medication mifepristone, with a consensus emerging during arguments that the abortion opponents challenging the FDA's approval lack legal standing to sue. Justices, including conservative appointees, expressed skepticism about the opponents' standing, signaling a potential dismissal of the case. The decision, expected by early summer, could have significant political and practical implications, affecting access to medication abortions and telehealth visits. Abortion rights activists rallied outside the court, and the case's outcome may impact future abortion-related regulations.

via The Associated Press|

#abortion #fda #law-and-politics

law-and-politics1 year ago•9 min saved

Supreme Court Justices Debate Abortion Pill Suit and Women's Health

The Supreme Court heard arguments on the legality of federal regulations allowing the distribution of the abortion drug mifepristone through the mail, with a focus on whether the anti-abortion doctors association that brought the case had standing to sue. Conservative justices questioned the standing of the group, suggesting skepticism, while the case could potentially roll back access to mifepristone and impact telehealth visits for abortion pills. The lawsuit, originally filed in Texas, has sparked debate over the safety and accessibility of mifepristone, with a ruling expected in late June.

via HuffPost|

#abortion #fda #law-and-politics

law-and-politics1 year ago•1 min saved

"Supreme Court Justices Express Doubt Over Effort to Limit Abortion Pill Access"

The U.S. Supreme Court justices appeared skeptical of a medical group's challenge to FDA regulations on abortion pills, questioning the group's standing to bring the suit and expressing concerns about the broader implications for the FDA's regulatory power. The case raises issues beyond abortion rights, delving into the FDA's authority to approve drugs and ensure their safety.

via NPR|

#abortion-pills #fda-regulations #law-and-politics

jurisprudence2 years ago•8 min saved

Unveiling the Reality of Texas' Abortion Laws: Amanda Zurawski's Perspective

Texas resident Kate Cox, facing a nonviable pregnancy that posed a threat to her future fertility, sought an abortion through a court's good-faith exception to Texas' restrictive abortion laws. However, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton intervened, threatening criminal sanctions against Cox's physicians and hospitals if they aided in the abortion. The Texas Supreme Court ultimately ruled that Cox's physician's belief did not meet the state's standard for a good-faith exception. Amanda Zurawski, the lead plaintiff in an ongoing lawsuit challenging Texas' abortion laws, and her lawyer, Jamie Levitt, discuss the standing issue and the state's attempts to evade judicial review while showing disdain for women facing pregnancy crises.

via Slate|

#abortion #jurisprudence #lawsuit

health2 years ago•3 min saved

"Every Move Matters: Boost Your Heart Health by Avoiding Excessive Sitting"

A new study published in the European Heart Journal found that even light activities such as standing or sleeping are better for heart health than sedentary behavior. Replacing sitting with just a few minutes of moderate exercise a day can improve heart health, with moderate-vigorous activity providing the most benefits. The study analyzed data from over 15,000 participants and found that replacing sedentary behavior with any other behavior, even lighter activities like walking or moving, can be beneficial. The researchers suggest that personalized recommendations can help individuals become more active and reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases.

via Euronews|

#health #heart-health #physical-activity

health2 years ago•3 min saved

Improved Accuracy: Standing Blood Pressure Test Outperforms in Hypertension Detection

Measuring blood pressure while standing instead of sitting may improve the accuracy of detecting hypertension, according to researchers at UT Southwestern Medical Center. Current blood pressure screening methods, which are typically done while patients are sitting, have limited sensitivity and reliability. The study found that measuring blood pressure in the standing position significantly improved diagnostic accuracy. This could lead to better detection and diagnosis of hypertension, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke.

via Medical Xpress|

#accuracy #blood-pressure #diagnosis

law-and-justice2 years ago•7 min saved

Supreme Court Debates Dismissal of Troublesome Civil Rights Case

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the civil rights case of Acheson Hotels v. Laufer, in which the plaintiff, Deborah Laufer, has asked for her own case to be dismissed. The Court is likely to dismiss the case either on standing grounds or on mootness grounds. The case involves a federal regulation requiring hotel websites to provide information about accessible features for individuals with disabilities. Laufer, who has filed numerous lawsuits against hotels for non-compliance, has not stayed at the hotel in question and her grievance is not a particularized injury. The Court's decision will have implications for future lawsuits involving the Reservation Rule and the rights of testers to bring civil rights suits.

via Vox.com|

#civil-rights #law-and-justice #lawsuit

politics2 years ago•5 min saved

Did Amy Coney Barrett Sabotage Student-Debt Relief Lawsuit?

Justice Amy Coney Barrett's recent ruling on a case challenging the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 may provide insight into how the Supreme Court will rule on the pending student-loan forgiveness plan. The ruling centered on the issue of standing, which is also central to the student-debt relief lawsuits. Barrett's decision to dismiss Texas' claims could signal how she and other justices might handle the student-loan forgiveness cases and the question of whether states can sue on behalf of other entities. A final decision is expected in the coming weeks.

via Business Insider|

#amy-coney-barrett #lawsuit #politics

education2 years ago•5 min saved

"Supreme Court's Impending Decision on Student Loan Forgiveness Sparks Proposals and Speculation"

The Supreme Court is expected to rule soon on President Biden's student loan forgiveness plan, which could provide up to $20,000 in debt relief for millions of Americans. The Court must evaluate whether the federal law cited by the Biden administration authorizes such sweeping debt relief and whether the challengers have standing to sue. A recent opinion by Justice Amy Coney Barrett in an unrelated case may provide clues as to how the Court will rule on the standing issue. The Court could potentially release its decision on June 16 or later in June or early July.

via Forbes|

#biden-administration #education #legal-challenges