A judge blocked Trump's attempt to freeze a $10 billion welfare fund, ruling that the administration overstepped its authority by trying to withhold funds already appropriated by Congress, amid allegations of fraud and waste in welfare programs.
A federal judge ruled that subpoenas issued to New York Attorney General Letitia James by John Sarcone were invalid because he lacked lawful authority as acting U.S. attorney, highlighting issues with appointments of acting officials without proper confirmation or appointment procedures.
The Texas American Federation of Teachers is suing the Texas education agency, claiming that its investigation and reporting policy on teachers' social media posts about Charlie Kirk violate free speech rights, as the agency's actions have led to disciplinary measures based solely on speech, without clear impact on school operations.
Over 2 million potential documents related to Jeffrey Epstein remain under review by the DOJ, well past the December 19 deadline set by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, with the process expected to take several more weeks due to the volume and complexity of the materials.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer criticized President Trump's military strike on Venezuela, calling it unlawful and a violation of U.S. law, expressing concern over the lack of congressional authorization and the potential for prolonged conflict, while questioning the effectiveness of U.S. efforts to fix Venezuela's oil infrastructure and criticizing the move away from Trump's campaign promises to avoid endless wars.
A man named Mike faces family demands for inheritance assets despite a clear will that leaves them nothing, leading to conflict and legal considerations about executor responsibilities, as discussed on 'The Ramsey Show.'
A federal appeals panel ruled that California's ban on open carry in urban areas is unconstitutional, citing conflicts with the Second Amendment, sparking debate over gun rights and regulations in the state.
A US appeals court ruled that California's ban on openly carrying firearms in most areas is unconstitutional, citing the Second Amendment and historical practices of open carry, partially reversing a previous lower court decision and highlighting ongoing legal debates over gun restrictions.
A US appeals court ruled that California's ban on openly carrying firearms in most areas is unconstitutional, citing the Second Amendment and historical practices of open carry, partially reversing a previous lower court decision.
A federal appeals court in California ruled that the state's ban on open carry of firearms in most urban areas is unconstitutional, citing the 2nd Amendment and historical gun rights, while upholding the permit process for open carry.
A U.S. appeals court ruled that California's ban on openly carrying firearms in most areas is unconstitutional, citing the Second Amendment and historical practices of open carry, partially reversing a lower court decision and highlighting ongoing legal debates over gun rights.
A federal appeals court in California ruled that the state's ban on openly carrying guns in most public places is unconstitutional, citing a recent Supreme Court decision and the Second Amendment, effectively striking down the law that restricted open carry for most residents.
A U.S. appeals court ruled that California's ban on openly carrying firearms in most areas is unconstitutional, citing the state's restrictions as inconsistent with the Second Amendment and historical firearm practices, though the decision is subject to further legal review.
A federal judge denied bail for Brian J. Cole Jr., charged with planting pipe bombs outside DNC and RNC headquarters on the eve of the Capitol riot, citing public safety concerns and the potential for devastating consequences if his actions had succeeded. Cole, who confessed to the bombings and expressed intent to target political parties due to beliefs about the 2020 election, faces significant prison time if convicted. His defense argued he posed no danger due to his lack of criminal history and living situation, but the judge emphasized the risk of impulsive conduct.
A class-action lawsuit in Virginia accuses Drake, Adin Ross, and an Australian man of promoting online gambling on Stake.us, using proceeds to artificially inflate music streams and manipulate digital content, allegedly violating racketeering laws and consumer protection statutes.