
Vaccination Policy Under 'Shared Decision-Making' Sparks Debate
STAT argues that federal use of 'shared decision-making' in vaccine guidance risks misrepresenting the strength of evidence, shifting emphasis to individual choice in matters of public health, and undermining trust. Experts say SDM is about clinician-patient collaboration informed by evidence, not a license to downplay clearly beneficial vaccines; the language echoes past policy shifts (e.g., 'should' vs 'may') and could influence state rule-making and vaccination uptake.





