politicslaw4.75 min read
"EEOC Introduces Controversial Abortion Accommodations in Pregnancy Act Regulations"
1 year ago•Source: The Associated Press
Politicslaw News
The latest politicslaw stories, summarized by AI
Featured Politicslaw Stories
View original source
4.105 min•1 year ago
"Supreme Court's Review of Mifepristone Case Raises Concerns for Abortion Access"
During oral arguments, Supreme Court justices Alito and Thomas repeatedly referenced the 1873 Comstock Act in relation to the abortion drug mifepristone, raising concerns about potential threats to abortion access. Legal experts anticipate the court will rule to preserve the FDA's authority, but fear the justices may write a separate opinion focused on the Comstock Act, providing legal cover for a future administration to invoke it. Antiabortion activists have sought to use the law to block mailing of abortion-related drugs, while the Biden administration staunchly opposes such efforts.
More Top Stories
2
"NY AG Threatens to Seize Trump's NYC Properties Over $355M Fine"
New York Post •1 year ago
3
"Trump's Jan. 6 Immunity Case: The Supreme Court Decision"
NBC News•1 year ago
More Politicslaw Stories
Australia Introduces Ban on Doxxing Following Targeting of Jewish Community
The Australian government plans to outlaw doxxing after pro-Palestinian activists published personal details of hundreds of Jewish people, sparking concerns about online safety and hate speech. The proposed laws would involve issuing take-down notices to social media platforms and imposing fines for the intimidation tactic. The move comes in response to reports of increased antisemitism in Australia since Israel’s war against Hamas began in October, and has been welcomed by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. However, there are concerns about enforcement and the role of social media companies in preventing doxxing.
Australia to Criminalize Doxxing Following Jewish Data Leak
The Australian government plans to outlaw doxxing after pro-Palestinian activists published personal details of hundreds of Jewish people, proposing laws that involve issuing take-down notices to social media platforms and imposing fines for the intimidation tactic. The move comes in response to reports of increased antisemitism in Australia since Israel's conflict with Hamas. While the plan was welcomed by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, some experts question how such a law could be effectively enforced, suggesting that social media companies bear the primary responsibility.
"Supreme Court's Potential Blow to Federal Agency Powers"
Two of Trump's Supreme Court appointees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, are leading the charge to eliminate the Chevron doctrine, a 40-year-old legal principle that empowers federal agencies to interpret laws when they are unclear. The conservative majority on the Supreme Court appears set to overturn this precedent, potentially impacting regulations on public health, workplace safety, and consumer protections. The outcome of the case, which is expected by early summer, could significantly limit the power of federal agencies and lead to a flood of litigation challenging longstanding regulations.
"Supreme Court's Impact on Federal Agencies and Regulation"
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, son of former EPA chief Anne Gorsuch, has displayed a strong anti-regulatory stance, voting against regulations for the environment, student-debt forgiveness, and Covid-19 precautions. He has led calls to reverse the 1984 Chevron doctrine, which gives federal agencies considerable regulatory latitude. The upcoming Supreme Court cases will test the fate of this doctrine, which has been a touchstone for resolving conflicts over agency power. The outcome could significantly impact the balance of power between federal agencies and the courts.
"Federal Judge to Rule on Constitutionality of Georgia's Election System in Upcoming Trial"
A federal trial in Georgia is set to determine the constitutionality of the state's election system, with activists arguing that the Dominion Voting Systems machines are flawed and violate voters' rights. The lawsuit, which began in 2017, claims the machines have security vulnerabilities and compromise ballot secrecy. Georgia officials defend the system's security and reliability. The case has gained attention amidst false claims about the 2020 election and a recent breach in Coffee County. The trial's outcome could impact the state's election procedures ahead of the 2024 elections, although any changes before the upcoming presidential primary are unlikely.
"Supreme Court Trump Ballot Ruling: A Defining Moment for 2024 Election and Democracy"
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to decide if former President Donald Trump can appear on the Colorado ballot for the 2024 presidential election after the state's highest court ruled he engaged in insurrection, barring him under the 14th Amendment. This decision could have a significant impact on Trump's candidacy and the broader democratic process, as it's the first major application of this constitutional provision since the Civil War. The outcome will influence not only Colorado but potentially other states considering similar actions, and the court aims to resolve the matter quickly to avoid prolonged uncertainty.
"Supreme Court Faces Pressure as States and Scholars Weigh in on Trump's 2024 Ballot Battle"
Twenty-seven states have filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of former President Donald Trump, urging the court to keep him on the Colorado GOP presidential ballot for 2024. They argue that the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to label Trump an "insurrectionist" under the Fourteenth Amendment, which could disqualify him from holding office, could lead to national electoral chaos. The states contend that the ruling is vague, denies due process, and could undermine voters' confidence in the electoral process. The Supreme Court has issued an administrative stay and will hear arguments on the case, emphasizing the urgency of resolving the matter before the primaries and caucuses.
"Supreme Court's Trump Ballot Decision: Predictions, Backings, and the Debate on Democratic Principles"
Judge J. Michael Luttig has made a prediction about the Supreme Court's impending decision on a case involving former President Donald Trump's eligibility to appear on the ballot, suggesting the outcome is clear. This comes amid various political figures expressing their views on the January 6 attack and the peaceful transfer of power, with Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-V.I.) finding revisionist narratives of the attack infuriating, and state officials emphasizing the constitutional importance of a peaceful transition. The situation underscores the ongoing legal and political battles surrounding Trump and the broader implications for American democracy.
"Debating the Nature of Jan. 6: Protest, Riot, or Insurrection?"
Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley, speaking on "The Brian Kilmeade Show," argued that the January 6 Capitol riot was not an insurrection or rebellion, as former President Trump has not been charged with such, and the public generally views it as a protest that turned into a riot. Turley warned that efforts to disqualify Trump based on these events threaten democracy and could lead to a slippery slope of political retribution. Additionally, a federal judge dismissed most civil counts against Trump in a lawsuit related to the death of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick during the January 6 events.
"Wayne LaPierre Steps Down as NRA Chief Before Graft Trial Commences"
Wayne LaPierre has stepped down as the leader of the National Rifle Association (NRA) ahead of a corruption trial brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. LaPierre, who has been the NRA's chief executive since 1991, has been accused of using the organization's funds for personal luxuries. His resignation comes as the NRA faces declining membership and revenue, and the trial is set to proceed without delay. The NRA cites health reasons for his departure, and Andrew Arulanandam will serve as interim CEO and executive vice president. Despite the controversies, LaPierre was re-elected last year due to his fundraising and legislative successes. The organization's future influence may hinge on the outcome of the upcoming trial.