"Supreme Court's Impact on Federal Agencies and Regulation"
TL;DR Summary
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, son of former EPA chief Anne Gorsuch, has displayed a strong anti-regulatory stance, voting against regulations for the environment, student-debt forgiveness, and Covid-19 precautions. He has led calls to reverse the 1984 Chevron doctrine, which gives federal agencies considerable regulatory latitude. The upcoming Supreme Court cases will test the fate of this doctrine, which has been a touchstone for resolving conflicts over agency power. The outcome could significantly impact the balance of power between federal agencies and the courts.
Topics:nation#chevron-doctrine#federal-agencies#neil-gorsuch#politicslaw#regulatory-power#supreme-court
- Neil Gorsuch has a grudge against federal agencies. He holds their fate in his hands CNN
- A Potentially Huge Supreme Court Case Has a Hidden Conservative Backer The New York Times
- Supreme court to hear arguments in case that threatens federal power Axios
- Opinion | Chevron Deference Is a Case of Too Much Judicial Restraint The Wall Street Journal
- Will the Supreme Court Finish Trump's War Against Regulation? The New Republic
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
2
Time Saved
8 min
vs 9 min read
Condensed
95%
1,621 → 84 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN