legalhealth1.75 min read
Sen. Bob Menendez's Bribery Trial Deliberations Continue; Wife's Trial Delayed Indefinitely
1 year ago•Source: NBC News
Legalhealth News
The latest legalhealth stories, summarized by AI
Featured Legalhealth Stories
View original source
2.39 min•1 year ago
Supreme Court Backs Native Tribes in Health Funding Dispute
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of Native American tribes, requiring the federal government to cover millions in overhead costs for tribes running their own health care programs. This decision supports tribal sovereignty and aims to address funding gaps, despite dissenting opinions that such financial decisions should be left to Congress.
More Top Stories
2
3
Texas Supreme Court Upholds Abortion Ban, Rejects Health Risk Challenge
USA TODAY•1 year ago
More Legalhealth Stories
Texas Supreme Court Upholds Abortion Ban Despite Medical Exceptions Challenge
The Texas Supreme Court unanimously rejected a challenge to the state's abortion ban brought by women with serious pregnancy complications, seeking clarification on exceptions. The ruling affirms that certain conditions like preterm premature rupture of membranes can warrant an abortion but does not allow abortions based solely on life-limiting fetal diagnoses. Critics argue the decision leaves many women and doctors in uncertainty, potentially endangering lives.
Texas Supreme Court Upholds Abortion Ban, Allows Lawsuit to Proceed
The Texas Supreme Court has allowed a lawsuit challenging the state's abortion bans to proceed but refused to block the bans during the litigation. The lawsuit, now involving over 20 women, argues that the bans endanger lives by denying necessary medical care. The court maintained that Texas law permits life-saving abortions but criticized the lower court's broader interpretation of medical emergencies. Critics argue the ruling fails to provide clarity and disregards the plaintiffs' suffering.
Texas Supreme Court Upholds Abortion Ban Despite Health Risks
The Texas Supreme Court unanimously rejected a significant challenge to the state's new abortion laws, ruling that the medical exceptions in the law are broad enough to withstand constitutional scrutiny. The case, Zurawski v. Texas, involved women with complicated pregnancies who argued that the laws prevented them from receiving necessary medical care. The court's decision overturned a previous temporary injunction that allowed abortions based on a doctor's "good faith judgment," stating that the law's requirement for "reasonable medical judgment" is clear. The ruling has been criticized for not providing sufficient reassurance to doctors and for potentially endangering women's health.
Fired Penn State Football Doctor Wins $5.25M in Lawsuit
A Dauphin County jury awarded Dr. Scott Lynch $5.25 million in his lawsuit against Penn State Health and Dr. Kevin Black after he was fired from the Penn State football team. Lynch claimed his dismissal was due to conflicts with head coach James Franklin over player injuries. Although Franklin was not sued, he was frequently mentioned during the trial, with former players testifying in his defense.
Family Sues Stew Leonard's Over Fatal Allergic Reaction to Mislabeled Cookie
The family of Órla Baxendale, a professional dancer who died from an allergic reaction to a mislabeled cookie containing peanuts, is suing Stew Leonard's grocery chain, the cookie manufacturer, and employees for wrongful death. The lawsuit claims gross negligence and failure to update ingredient labels despite prior notification from the manufacturer. The family seeks damages exceeding $15,000, citing the store's failure to prevent the tragedy.
Family Sues Stew Leonard's Over Dancer's Death from Mislabeled Peanut Cookie
A wrongful death lawsuit has been filed against Stew Leonard's and Cookies United after 25-year-old Órla Baxendale died from anaphylaxis due to a mislabeled cookie containing peanuts. The lawsuit alleges gross negligence and seeks substantial damages, aiming to prevent future incidents. Both companies have expressed condolences and are cooperating with investigations.
"Supreme Court's Abortion Pill Access Hearing: Live Updates and Implications"
The Supreme Court is set to hear a case regarding the availability of the abortion pill, mifepristone, which could potentially restrict access to the drug. The case challenges the FDA's decisions to expand access to the drug in 2016 and 2021, and could have broader implications for the regulatory authority of the FDA. The case has sparked protests and could impact the availability of medication abortion across the United States.
"Supreme Court's Battle Over Abortion Pills Sparks Controversy"
The US Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in a case regarding the abortion pill mifepristone, with opponents citing studies to argue for limiting its access, while the FDA maintains its safety. The plaintiffs claim that the studies show increased risk, but the research group behind the studies disagrees, stating that the conclusions support easier access to the medication. The case could have broader implications for federal regulatory authority over drug safety, and a ruling is expected by the end of June.
"Philanthropist pledges $300K to cover legal costs for Canadian doctor defying COVID vaccine mandates"
X pledges to cover the $300,000 legal fees for Canadian doctor Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill, who opposed lockdowns and vaccination mandates and faced a smear campaign as a result. After losing a legal battle and being ordered to pay $300,000, X stepped in to support her, citing the importance of free speech and democracy. Elon Musk, the platform's owner, endorsed the decision, emphasizing his support for free speech.
"Montana Judge Strikes Down Three Abortion Laws as Unconstitutional"
A Montana judge has declared three laws restricting abortion rights, including a ban on abortions after 20 weeks, as unconstitutional, citing severe burdens on access without clear justification. The laws, passed in 2021, have been blocked from enforcement, and the state plans to appeal the ruling. Planned Parenthood hailed the decision as a critical victory, while additional anti-abortion laws in Montana face court challenges.