All articles tagged with #sports law
The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether federal law, specifically Title IX, prohibits transgender girls from participating in women's sports teams, amid ongoing legal battles and political debates over gender identity and sports participation rights.
The University of Wisconsin has filed a lawsuit against the University of Miami for allegedly interfering with a binding revenue-share contract and tampering with Xavier Lucas, a player who transferred from Wisconsin to Miami, in a landmark case that could set a precedent for enforcing tampering clauses in college sports contracts.
Eight female athletes are appealing the House v. NCAA settlement, arguing it violates Title IX by not ensuring equitable distribution of $2.8 billion in backpay damages, which they claim favors male athletes and deprives women of their fair share, potentially delaying payments for months or more.
A federal judge in Colorado, appointed by President Biden, has denied witness testimony for an emergency hearing in a lawsuit involving a dozen women suing the Mountain West Conference over alleged First Amendment and Title IX violations related to transgender volleyball player Blaire Fleming. The hearing will focus on an injunction to disqualify San Jose State from the conference tournament. The judge's decision to forgo witness testimony is seen as unfavorable for the plaintiffs, with a ruling needed soon as the tournament begins Wednesday.
The Sunday Ticket trial is progressing towards a jury verdict despite the judge's critical comments about the plaintiff's case. Stanford economist Douglas Bernheim testified for the NFL, arguing that changes to the NFL's TV model could destabilize the league. The plaintiffs may present rebuttal witnesses before closing arguments and jury instructions. If the plaintiffs win, the NFL is expected to appeal, potentially reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.
The NFL faces a multi-billion dollar antitrust lawsuit over its Sunday Ticket package, which restricts out-of-market game broadcasts to a single, expensive package. The plaintiffs argue this creates a monopoly, while the NFL claims it offers the best value for fans. The case, which could significantly impact sports television rights, is being heard in federal court in Los Angeles.
Opening arguments are starting in a class-action lawsuit against the NFL by "Sunday Ticket" subscribers, who claim the league broke antitrust laws by allowing DirecTV to exclusively sell the package at inflated prices. The case, which could last up to three weeks, may reveal financial details about the NFL's broadcasting deals, including YouTube's current agreement for "Sunday Ticket." NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones are expected to testify.
Jeffrey Kessler, a prominent sports attorney, has significantly impacted college sports by leading a legal battle against the NCAA, resulting in a $2.8 billion settlement in favor of college athletes. This landmark case, House v. NCAA, will see athletes receiving substantial compensation and has reshaped the landscape of college sports. Kessler's career, marked by numerous high-profile cases, continues to influence the sports industry profoundly.
The NFL is facing a federal antitrust trial in Los Angeles over its "Sunday Ticket" telecast, with potential damages reaching up to $21 billion. Plaintiffs claim the NFL's exclusive deal with DirecTV inflated prices and restricted distribution. The trial, which could see testimonies from high-profile NFL figures, will determine if the league is liable and may lead to changes in the "Sunday Ticket" distribution model.
As the NCAA moves towards allowing direct payments to college athletes, questions arise about whether these payments will be public records. Public universities may be required to disclose such payments under state laws, but private universities and NIL deals might remain confidential. The issue hinges on whether athletes are considered university employees, a matter that could be settled by state legislatures or Congress. The debate also touches on Title IX implications and competitive fairness in recruiting.
The NCAA has settled a lawsuit with state attorneys general and the U.S. Department of Justice, agreeing to permanently allow multi-time transfers to play immediately if they meet academic requirements. The settlement also grants an extra year of eligibility to affected athletes and prevents the NCAA from enforcing restrictive transfer rules or retaliating against those who sue. This marks a significant shift in the NCAA's legal stance and follows a recent settlement allowing institutions to pay athletes directly.
The Justice Department and a coalition of states have filed a proposed consent decree to prevent the NCAA from enforcing its Transfer Eligibility Rule, which restricted college athletes' ability to transfer between Division I institutions. The decree, if approved, will also grant an additional year of eligibility to affected athletes. This action aims to enhance competition and provide better opportunities for college athletes.
A jury awarded former Penn State team doctor Scott Lynch $5.25 million in a lawsuit alleging he was removed for challenging head football coach James Franklin's interference in medical decisions. Lynch hopes the verdict will prompt the NCAA to enforce its policy on the independence of sports medicine staff. Penn State Health expressed disappointment and is considering an appeal.
Dr. Scott Lynch won a $5.25 million verdict against Penn State Health and Dr. Kevin Black for his 2019 dismissal from his roles with the Penn State football team, a case that highlighted head coach James Franklin's alleged interference in medical decisions. Lynch emphasized the broader goal of protecting college athletes, despite Franklin not being a defendant in the case. Penn State Health is considering an appeal.
Attorney Tony Buzbee invited former Jaguars kicker Brandon McManus to engage in pre-suit mediation over claims made by two Atlas Air flight attendants, but the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit after McManus's lawyer requested a monetary demand. McManus denies the allegations, calling them fictitious and extortionate.