
Sports Law News
The latest sports law stories, summarized by AI
Featured Sports Law Stories


Female Athletes Challenge NCAA Settlement Over Title IX Violations
Eight female athletes are appealing the House v. NCAA settlement, arguing it violates Title IX by not ensuring equitable distribution of $2.8 billion in backpay damages, which they claim favors male athletes and deprives women of their fair share, potentially delaying payments for months or more.

More Top Stories
"Sunday Ticket Trial Nears Verdict Amid Criticism and Controversy"
NBC Sports•1 year ago
NFL's $21B Sunday Ticket Antitrust Trial Begins
CNN•1 year ago
More Sports Law Stories
NFL's Billion-Dollar Sunday Ticket Antitrust Trial Begins
Originally Published 1 year ago — by The Associated Press

Opening arguments are starting in a class-action lawsuit against the NFL by "Sunday Ticket" subscribers, who claim the league broke antitrust laws by allowing DirecTV to exclusively sell the package at inflated prices. The case, which could last up to three weeks, may reveal financial details about the NFL's broadcasting deals, including YouTube's current agreement for "Sunday Ticket." NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones are expected to testify.
NCAA Faces Crisis: Legal Battles and Calls for Reform Threaten Future
Originally Published 1 year ago — by CBS Sports

Jeffrey Kessler, a prominent sports attorney, has significantly impacted college sports by leading a legal battle against the NCAA, resulting in a $2.8 billion settlement in favor of college athletes. This landmark case, House v. NCAA, will see athletes receiving substantial compensation and has reshaped the landscape of college sports. Kessler's career, marked by numerous high-profile cases, continues to influence the sports industry profoundly.
NFL's $21B 'Sunday Ticket' Antitrust Trial Kicks Off in LA
Originally Published 1 year ago — by New York Post

The NFL is facing a federal antitrust trial in Los Angeles over its "Sunday Ticket" telecast, with potential damages reaching up to $21 billion. Plaintiffs claim the NFL's exclusive deal with DirecTV inflated prices and restricted distribution. The trial, which could see testimonies from high-profile NFL figures, will determine if the league is liable and may lead to changes in the "Sunday Ticket" distribution model.
"College Athletes Set to Receive Payments Amid Complex NCAA Changes"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by Deseret News

As the NCAA moves towards allowing direct payments to college athletes, questions arise about whether these payments will be public records. Public universities may be required to disclose such payments under state laws, but private universities and NIL deals might remain confidential. The issue hinges on whether athletes are considered university employees, a matter that could be settled by state legislatures or Congress. The debate also touches on Title IX implications and competitive fairness in recruiting.
NCAA Settles Transfer Portal Lawsuit
Originally Published 1 year ago — by On3.com

The NCAA has settled a lawsuit with state attorneys general and the U.S. Department of Justice, agreeing to permanently allow multi-time transfers to play immediately if they meet academic requirements. The settlement also grants an extra year of eligibility to affected athletes and prevents the NCAA from enforcing restrictive transfer rules or retaliating against those who sue. This marks a significant shift in the NCAA's legal stance and follows a recent settlement allowing institutions to pay athletes directly.
"Justice Department Restores Competition for NCAA Division I Athletes"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by Department of Justice
The Justice Department and a coalition of states have filed a proposed consent decree to prevent the NCAA from enforcing its Transfer Eligibility Rule, which restricted college athletes' ability to transfer between Division I institutions. The decree, if approved, will also grant an additional year of eligibility to affected athletes. This action aims to enhance competition and provide better opportunities for college athletes.
Ex-PSU Doctor Wins $5.25M in James Franklin Interference Case
Originally Published 1 year ago — by ESPN

A jury awarded former Penn State team doctor Scott Lynch $5.25 million in a lawsuit alleging he was removed for challenging head football coach James Franklin's interference in medical decisions. Lynch hopes the verdict will prompt the NCAA to enforce its policy on the independence of sports medicine staff. Penn State Health expressed disappointment and is considering an appeal.
Fired PSU Doctor Wins $5.25M in Suit Against James Franklin
Originally Published 1 year ago — by PennLive

Dr. Scott Lynch won a $5.25 million verdict against Penn State Health and Dr. Kevin Black for his 2019 dismissal from his roles with the Penn State football team, a case that highlighted head coach James Franklin's alleged interference in medical decisions. Lynch emphasized the broader goal of protecting college athletes, despite Franklin not being a defendant in the case. Penn State Health is considering an appeal.
NFL Kicker Brandon McManus Faces Sexual Assault Lawsuit from Two Women
Originally Published 1 year ago — by NBC Sports

Attorney Tony Buzbee invited former Jaguars kicker Brandon McManus to engage in pre-suit mediation over claims made by two Atlas Air flight attendants, but the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit after McManus's lawyer requested a monetary demand. McManus denies the allegations, calling them fictitious and extortionate.
Ex-NFL Kicker Brandon McManus Faces Sexual Assault Lawsuit Over Team Flight Incident
Originally Published 1 year ago — by NBC Sports

Two flight attendants have filed a lawsuit against the Jaguars and former kicker Brandon McManus, alleging sexual misconduct during a flight. The complaint details multiple instances of inappropriate behavior by McManus, including unwanted physical advances. The lawsuit accuses McManus of assault and the Jaguars of negligence in hiring and supervising him. McManus's lawyer has denied the allegations, calling them false and defamatory. The case seeks compensatory and punitive damages, with a potential trial and discovery process ahead.