Tag

Landowners

All articles tagged with #landowners

legalproperty-rights2 years ago

"Supreme Court Case Shapes National Property Rights in Texas Feud"

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in a case involving Texas landowners seeking federal relief for property damage caused by state actions. The case could redefine how states compensate landowners for property taken by the government under the Fifth Amendment. Justices debated whether the case should be heard in federal or state courts, with Texas arguing that the landowners failed to use state avenues for compensation. The state's position was met with skepticism from some justices, and the outcome could have far-reaching implications for property rights and government compensation nationwide.

energy2 years ago

Navigator Abandons $3.5B Carbon Capture Pipeline Project, Impacting Multiple States

Navigator has announced the cancellation of its CO2 pipeline project after their permit application was denied by the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission. The project, which would have spanned South Dakota, Nebraska, Iowa, and Illinois, faced challenges in the regulatory and government processes. Landowners, who were concerned about the potential use of eminent domain, viewed the denial as a victory.

energy-and-environment2 years ago

Summit Carbon's Pipeline Permit Denied by North Dakota

Summit Carbon Solutions has been denied a permit to construct its proposed carbon dioxide pipeline in North Dakota. The state's Public Service Commission unanimously ruled that the company failed to demonstrate that the project would minimize adverse impacts on the welfare of North Dakota citizens. Summit can appeal the decision or submit a new application with a revised proposal. The $5 billion project aims to transport captured carbon dioxide from ethanol plants to North Dakota for underground sequestration. Opponents argue that the pipelines will prolong the use of fossil fuels and infringe on landowners' property rights.

environment2 years ago

Supreme Court curtails Clean Water Act's authority over wetlands.

The Supreme Court has ruled that an Idaho couple's property does not include wetlands subject to federal oversight under the Clean Water Act, weakening the landmark water pollution law. The decision ends a yearslong battle between the Sacketts and the federal government and is a victory for conservative groups and business interests opposed to the broad application of the water pollution law. The ruling is another example of the court's conservative justices powering a decision that curbs broad power of federal agencies, a consistent theme in recent years.