tldrdaily.news logo
Tag

Civil Rights Act

All articles tagged with #civil rights act

politics8 hours ago

Court Rules DOJ Overreach in California Voter-Roll Request

A federal judge dismissed the DOJ’s lawsuit seeking California’s voter rolls, calling the demand unprecedented, illegal and a threat to democracy, and warned that centralizing such data could chill voter registration and turnout. The ruling sides with California officials who argued the data request overstepped federal authority and improperly used civil rights laws to amass millions of voter records. The decision halts the DOJ’s bid tied to broader federal efforts to scrub and review voter rolls ahead of elections.

via Los Angeles Times|
#california#civil-rights-act#justice-department
world6 months ago

Trump Administration Accuses Harvard of Civil Rights Violations Over Antisemitism

The U.S. government’s Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism has accused Harvard of violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act through antisemitic incidents and inaction, threatening to cut federal funding if the university does not implement corrective measures. Harvard disputes the findings, citing ongoing efforts to address antisemitism and promote respectful dialogue on campus.

via NBC News|
#antisemitism#civil-rights-act#discrimination
legal1 year ago

"Federal Court Blocks Atlanta Grant Fund for Black Women Entrepreneurs"

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals halted the Fearless Fund's grant program for Black women entrepreneurs, ruling it likely violates the Civil Rights Act of 1866 by using race in making contracts. This decision is a significant win for conservative groups challenging DEI initiatives. The Fearless Fund argued the grants are charitable donations protected by the First Amendment, but the court disagreed, reversing a lower court's decision and imposing a preliminary injunction.

via The Atlanta Journal Constitution|
#civil-rights-act#dei#edward-blum
legal-employment1 year ago

"Supreme Court Eases Path for Workplace Discrimination Lawsuits"

The Supreme Court ruled that workers who are transferred against their will can pursue job discrimination claims under federal civil rights law, even if they are not demoted or have their pay docked. The decision revives a sex discrimination lawsuit filed by a St. Louis police sergeant who was forcibly transferred but retained her rank and pay. The ruling makes it clear that employers cannot make job decisions based on race and gender, and the case now returns to lower courts for further proceedings.

via ABC News|
#civil-rights-act#forced-transfers#job-discrimination
education1 year ago

"Controversy Surrounds George Floyd Scholarship Discrimination Claims"

The George Floyd Memorial Scholarship at North Central University is facing a federal complaint for allegedly violating the Civil Rights Act by discriminating against non-Black students. The scholarship, which requires applicants to be Black or African American, has been accused of violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Legal Insurrection Foundation filed the complaint, claiming that the scholarship's eligibility criteria unlawfully discriminates based on race. North Central University has not yet responded to the complaint.

via NBC News|
#civil-rights-act#discrimination#education
politics1 year ago

"PA Appeals Courts Set Precedent for Mail-In Ballot Dating Requirements"

A Pennsylvania federal appeals court has ruled that mail-in ballots without accurate handwritten dates on the envelopes are not valid, overturning a lower court's decision. The ruling, impacting the upcoming elections in the battleground state, requires voters to write the date on their envelopes as mandated by state law. Republicans welcome the decision as a victory for election integrity, while critics argue that thousands of eligible voters could lose their votes over a paperwork error. The issue of mail-in voting continues to be a contentious topic, with former President Donald Trump and others raising concerns about election integrity.

via Fox News|
#civil-rights-act#election-integrity#mail-in-ballots
politics1 year ago

"3rd Circuit Panel Rules on Pennsylvania 'Undated' Ballots"

A federal appeals panel ruled that undated or incorrectly dated mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania should not be counted, setting the stage for a potential U.S. Supreme Court battle. The decision could impact the outcome of the presidential election and other races in the swing state. The ruling, which strikes down a lower court decision, has sparked debate over voter rights and election integrity, with the Republican National Committee expressing confidence in the decision while the ACLU considers its options. The issue of undated ballots has raised concerns about disenfranchisement, particularly among elderly voters, and has implications for mail-in voting trends between Democrats and Republicans.

via NPR|
#3rd-us-circuit-court-of-appeals#civil-rights-act#mail-in-ballots
politics1 year ago

Iowa Lawmakers Reject Bill to Remove Gender Identity from Civil Rights Protections

Iowans celebrated as lawmakers rejected a bill that would have removed gender identity protections from the state's civil rights law. The bill aimed to add gender dysphoria to the definition of a disability and remove gender identity protections from the Iowa Civil Rights Act. LGBTQ rights groups and allies packed the Capitol to protest the bill, with emotional testimonies from transgender individuals and their supporters. Lawmakers who opposed the bill emphasized the importance of protecting civil rights and expressed reluctance to revisit the Iowa Civil Rights Act.

via Des Moines Register|
#civil-rights-act#discrimination#gender-identity
politics1 year ago

Iowa Upholds Gender Identity as Civil Right Despite Legislative Challenges

Lawmakers in Iowa announced the rejection of a bill that would have removed gender identity protections from the state's civil rights law, sparking cheers and celebrations among LGBTQ Iowans and their allies at the Capitol. The bill aimed to add gender dysphoria to the definition of a disability and remove gender identity protections from the Iowa Civil Rights Act, but all three members of the House subcommittee decided not to advance it. This decision was met with relief and support from the community, as they voiced their opposition to the bill and emphasized the importance of protecting civil rights for all individuals, including those in the LGBTQ community.

via USA TODAY|
#civil-rights-act#discrimination#gender-identity
legal-politics2 years ago

"DOJ Secures Settlement with NY Executive Chamber Over Cuomo Harassment Claims"

The Justice Department has reached a settlement agreement with the State of New York Executive Chamber to address claims of sexual harassment and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The agreement acknowledges reforms already implemented by Governor Kathy Hochul and outlines additional measures to prevent such misconduct in the future, including expanding the Human Resources Department, creating new reporting and investigation procedures, implementing anti-retaliation programs, and assessing the effectiveness of these reforms. The department's investigation found that the Executive Chamber under former Governor Andrew Cuomo subjected female employees to a sexually hostile work environment, tolerated the behavior, and retaliated against those who spoke out. This settlement is part of the Justice Department's initiative to combat sexual harassment in government workplaces.

via Department of Justice|
#civil-rights-act#justice-department#legal-politics
business2 years ago

"Legal Challenges Prompt Companies to Revise DEI Programs"

Conservative activists are using Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 to challenge workplace diversity programs and funding for minority-owned businesses, including suing the Fearless Fund, a venture capital fund investing in businesses owned by women of color. This tactic has led to legal battles and changes in diversity fellowship programs at companies like Pfizer, Morrison Foerster, and Perkins Coie. The impact of these lawsuits could potentially reshape how diversity programs and funding are structured in the workplace.

via New York Post |
#business#civil-rights-act#fearless-fund
education2 years ago

Rising Discrimination Investigations Target US Universities

The University of California, San Diego (UCSD) and San Diego State University (SDSU) are under investigation by the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) for alleged violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. The investigations are part of the Biden-Harris Administration's efforts to address the rise in reports of discrimination and harassment on college campuses and in K-12 schools. Both universities have stated that they take allegations of discrimination seriously and will cooperate fully with the investigations. U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona emphasized the importance of creating safe and inclusive educational environments free from hatred and discrimination.

via FOX 5 San Diego|
#civil-rights-act#discrimination#education
law-and-justice2 years ago

Supreme Court Expands Protection Against Biased Job Transfers

The Supreme Court appears inclined to allow a female police officer in St. Louis to sue for employment discrimination over a forced lateral transfer to another position in the police department. The justices debated what plaintiffs must prove when accusing employers of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The officer's lawyer argued that proving a discriminatory reason for the transfer should be enough, while the city's lawyer argued for a higher threshold of "significant, material, objective harm." The majority of justices seemed ready to embrace the officer's position, emphasizing that treating someone worse based on race or sex is discrimination in itself.

via The New York Times|
#civil-rights-act#employment-discrimination#law-and-justice
politics2 years ago

Federal Judge Orders Counting of Undated and Incorrectly Dated Mail-In Ballots in Pennsylvania

A federal judge in Pennsylvania has ruled that undated mail-in ballots that are received on time should be counted, stating that a state law rejecting such votes violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This ruling is seen as a victory for voting rights groups and has national implications as Republicans and conservative advocacy groups continue to push for stricter voting laws. The decision is expected to be appealed to the Supreme Court, where the court's conservative members have previously supported the state law requiring voters to date their ballots.

via The New York Times|
#civil-rights-act#mail-in-ballots#pennsylvania