All articles tagged with #ai policy
Games Workshop has imposed a cautious GenAI policy, permitting only a few senior managers to test the technology while banning its use across most operations; CEO Kevin Rountree stresses IP protection and a commitment to human artists, with the company expanding non-AI roles in art, writing, and miniature sculpting.
Games Workshop announced a cautious internal policy banning AI-generated content from its Warhammer design processes, citing data governance and IP protection; the decision, described by CEO Kevin Rountree as prudent, accompanies ongoing investments in human creatives and a rise in revenue, signaling a deliberate stance against AI-assisted design despite industry-wide AI adoption.
Anthropic is attempting to reassure the White House of its alignment with current AI policies and standards, despite recent criticisms from AI czar David Sacks, emphasizing its support for federal regulation and collaboration across political lines, amidst ongoing tensions over AI regulation strategies.
The article argues that the focus on achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) is overhyped and unlikely to be imminent, suggesting that the US should prioritize practical AI adoption and infrastructure improvements over chasing the elusive AGI milestone to maintain global leadership in AI.
Spotify announced updates to its AI policy, including adopting industry standards for labeling AI-generated music, implementing a new spam filter to combat malicious uploads, and clarifying that unauthorized voice cloning is prohibited, aiming to balance innovation with platform integrity.
As the midterms approach, Democrats are developing a messaging strategy focused on addressing how AI could widen economic divides and impact workers, emphasizing workforce retraining and equitable benefits, while Republicans advocate for less regulation and more testing space for AI development.
Chinese researchers are developing a new global AI strategy behind closed doors, without US input, shortly after the US released its AI action plan, indicating a strategic move in international AI leadership.
The White House plans to promote the export of American AI technology, reduce restrictions on AI development, and streamline related regulations, marking a shift from previous restrictive policies to a more expansion-focused approach, while also addressing risks and misuse of AI.
President-elect Trump has appointed David Sacks, a Silicon Valley veteran and ally of Elon Musk, as the "White House AI & Crypto Czar." Sacks, known for his conservative-libertarian views, will focus on promoting and deregulating cryptocurrency, reversing Biden's AI policies, and competing with China in AI. His role as a special government employee allows him to avoid confirmation hearings and financial disclosures, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest as he continues to run his private ventures.
LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman has raised concerns about Elon Musk's potential conflict of interest in setting AI policies under the Trump administration. Hoffman warns that Musk's involvement in the Department of Government Efficiency could lead to favoritism towards his company xAI, potentially harming U.S. technological and economic security. Hoffman also questions Trump's approach to cryptocurrency regulation, fearing it may benefit select ventures. Despite his criticisms, Hoffman hopes for positive outcomes in U.S. innovation and entrepreneurship.
Policymakers in Brussels are engaged in late-night negotiations to reach a deal on the European Union's ambitious law to regulate artificial intelligence (AI), while senators in the U.S. Congress express concerns about the EU's approach, fearing it could be heavy-handed and alienate AI developers. The split between the two sides highlights the challenges of regulating AI. Congress is lagging behind Brussels in developing AI legislation, but lawmakers are now working on crafting a bill. The EU's AI legislation remains uncertain due to lobbying and opposition from major member nations. Negotiations are ongoing, and if no agreement is reached soon, it may be difficult to pass any bill before European Parliament elections in June.
Lobbyists in Washington are capitalizing on the growing interest in artificial intelligence (AI) policy, with AI companies, industries, and interest groups enlisting their help to influence AI policy. The wide-ranging impact of AI across various sectors has led to a surge in business opportunities for lobbyists, who are positioning themselves as subject matter experts in AI. The lobbying frenzy has intensified as Congress delves into AI-related policy, with industries seeking incentives and avoiding restrictive regulations. OpenAI, while not officially hiring lobbyists, is building a presence in Washington and has tapped law firms for guidance and representation. Executives in the AI industry are also making significant campaign donations to cultivate political influence.
Former President Barack Obama played a significant role in helping President Joe Biden draft the new White House artificial intelligence (AI) policy, which was unveiled through an executive order. Obama, who has long been interested in AI, held meetings with industry leaders and congressional leaders to address national security concerns, bias, and discrimination related to AI. Biden instructed his cabinet to work together to develop policy recommendations on AI, with the Department of Commerce leading a task force to study emerging AI trends. The executive order aims to safeguard against AI-related threats and ensure responsible use of the technology. Obama's advice and engagement were crucial in shaping the administration's aggressive strategy to harness AI's benefits while minimizing risks.
President Joe Biden signed an executive order on artificial intelligence (AI) that addresses various concerns related to the technology, including cybersecurity, global competition, discrimination, and technical oversight. The order has garnered support from both the tech industry and its critics, reflecting an attempt by the White House to appease different factions within AI governance. These factions include progressives concerned about job security and civil rights, "longtermists" worried about existential risks, and AI hawks focused on national security. While the order's breadth aims to please multiple groups, there are concerns about its implementation and the ability of agencies to handle the workload. The order includes provisions to address real-world problems caused by AI, require reporting on advanced AI systems, and enhance national security and global competitiveness. Despite the positive reception, all factions agree that congressional action is still necessary.
President Biden has issued an executive order calling for a "governmentwide AI talent surge" to enhance the federal government's capacity in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). The order requires agencies to establish comprehensive policies for internal AI tool usage and mandates the rapid hiring of AI professionals. The aim is to prevent discrimination and bias in AI decision-making processes related to housing, benefits, and employment. The Office of Personnel Management will lead efforts to attract and retain AI experts across the government, and a task force will identify best practices for hiring AI talent. The executive order also includes measures to ensure the safety, security, and trustworthiness of AI systems, as well as the development of international frameworks for ethical AI use.