Kennedy’s Sugar Crusade Exposes MAHA’s Wider Regulatory Ambitions
Washington Post’s The Post’s View argues that Kennedy’s remarks about sugar and his push for private firms to disclose safety data signal a broader MAHA regulatory drive. Even with existing nutrition labeling, pressuring Dunkin’ and Starbucks to prove a drink’s safety could curb consumer choice, and Kennedy’s plan to end the FDA’s self-affirmation rule would require formal ingredient approvals. While MAHA’s health goals are laudable, the piece contends government isn’t the best engine for change, noting Kennedy’s credibility questions and citing MAHA ideas (including ivermectin over‑the‑counter proposals in Iowa). It calls on progressives to push back against nanny‑state tendencies that risks narrowing personal choice.
