Supreme Court sides with Prince estate in Warhol copyright case

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court ruled that Andy Warhol infringed on photographer Lynn Goldsmith's copyright when he created a series of silk screens based on her photograph of Prince. The court rejected arguments that Warhol's work was transformative enough to avoid copyright concerns. The ruling has been closely watched by the art world as it balances an artist's freedom to borrow from existing works and the restrictions of copyright law. The case centered on the "fair use" doctrine in copyright law, which permits unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances.
- Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol in copyright dispute over Prince portrait CNN
- Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol Foundation in copyright case over Prince photo CNBC
- Supreme Court rules against Warhol Foundation in copyright fight over Prince images NBC News
- Warhol estate loses U.S. Supreme Court copyright fight over Prince paintings Reuters
- Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol in copyright case with implications for artists USA TODAY
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
71%
312 → 89 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNN