legalcourt-cases1.5 min read
Supreme Court Rejects MyPillow CEO's Appeal for Phone Seizure
1 year ago•Source: USA TODAY
Legalcourt Cases News
The latest legalcourt cases stories, summarized by AI
Featured Legalcourt Cases Stories
View original source
5.465 min•1 year ago
"Inside Trump's Turbulent Criminal Trial: Jury Selection and Key Questions Answered"
Former President Donald Trump's legal team has been unable to secure delays or dismissals in the criminal cases pending against him, despite their efforts to disqualify the judge, move the case to another jurisdiction, and extend arguments about presidential immunity. Trump's behavior in the court of public opinion, characterized by bluster and bullying, has not translated to success in actual court proceedings, as evidenced by his recent legal losses. The upcoming trial in New York over alleged misuse of campaign funds presents the potential for criminal liability and jail time, signaling a serious legal challenge for the former president.
More Top Stories
2
"DA Fani Willis Defends Role in Trump Election Interference Case"
USA TODAY•1 year ago
3
"Trump's Legal Team Makes Last-Ditch Effort to Delay Hush-Money Trial"
The Associated Press•1 year ago
More Legalcourt Cases Stories
"Legal Battles: Letitia James Challenges Trump's Bond and Property Claims"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by Newsweek
New York Attorney Letitia James faces potential concerns over the sufficiency of the $175 million bond posted by Donald Trump in her civil fraud case, as a report reveals a line in the agreement that may leave her in the same position as before Trump secured the bond if he loses the appeal. Questions have been raised about the insurance company's ability to pay the bond, with James's office expressing doubt about its sufficiency and the bond being rejected by a court for lacking a current financial statement.
"Montana Asbestos Victims Sue Warren Buffet's Railroad Over Pollution Deaths"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by The Associated Press
Victims of asbestos pollution in Libby, Montana, are taking BNSF Railway, owned by Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway Inc., to court, alleging negligence and wrongful death for failing to control contaminated dust from the rail yard that led to hundreds of deaths and over 3,000 illnesses. The upcoming trial is the first among hundreds of lawsuits against BNSF, with victims seeking accountability for the asbestos-related diseases caused by the vermiculite shipped by rail from Libby for use across the U.S. The cleanup has cost an estimated $600 million, with most covered by taxpayer money, and the victims hope for justice in the upcoming trials.
"Trump's Legal Battles: Judge's Orders Signal Setbacks and Scrutiny"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by NPR
The judge in former President Donald Trump's classified documents case, Aileen Cannon, has been making pre-trial decisions that have raised concerns among legal experts and Special Counsel Jack Smith. The latest controversy revolves around the judge's request for jury instructions on the Presidential Records Act, which suggests she may be crediting Trump's defense that he was authorized to keep the documents. Smith's team has expressed concerns about the judge's legal premise and the potential impact on the case, emphasizing the need for a prompt resolution to avoid complications during the trial.
Judge Denies Trump's Motion to Dismiss Georgia Election Interference Case
Originally Published 1 year ago — by FOX 5 Atlanta
Fulton County Superior Judge Scott McAfee denied former President Donald Trump's motion to dismiss charges related to the 2020 election in Georgia on First Amendment grounds. The judge also denied a motion from defendant David Shafer. The trial may be delayed due to recent controversy surrounding the district attorney. Legal experts anticipate more challenges from Trump and his co-defendants, with the trial window closing faster as the November general election approaches.
"Judge Denies Trump's Delay Motion for NY Hush Money Trial Amid Immunity Ruling"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by Business Insider
A Manhattan judge rejected Donald Trump's bid for "presidential immunity" in his hush money trial, allowing prosecutors to share his statements about Stormy Daniels with jurors. The judge ruled that Trump's effort was too late and failed to provide a convincing explanation for the delay. The hush money trial remains on track for jury selection on April 15, with the Manhattan District Attorney alleging that Trump falsified business documents to disguise the payment to Daniels. Trump has pleaded not guilty and faces up to four years in prison if convicted.
"Special Counsel Jack Smith Pushes Back Against Judge's Ruling in Trump Documents Case"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by Fox News
Special Counsel Jack Smith criticized U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon's request for hypothetical jury instructions in the case of former President Trump's possession of classified documents, arguing that it rests on a "fundamentally flawed legal premise." Smith asserted that the Presidential Records Act is not relevant to Trump's case and warned that if the judge proceeds with her order, prosecutors will appeal. The case remains unsettled, with multiple defense motions to dismiss the indictment pending, and the trial date uncertain.
"Trump Continues Legal Battle to Remove Fani Willis from Georgia Election Case"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by The Washington Post
Donald Trump and his allies have appealed a judge's ruling allowing Fulton County District Attorney Fani T. Willis to remain on the Georgia election interference case, citing allegations of an improper relationship with a special prosecutor and financial enrichment from trips together. They argue that the judge's decision to keep Willis on the case is a "structural error" and are seeking the appeals court to reverse it. The defendants also raised concerns about Willis's comments on racism and have sought to appeal the ruling. The Georgia Court of Appeals has 45 days to determine whether it will take the case.
"Trump Appeals Georgia Court Ruling on DA Fani Willis Case"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by New York Post
Donald Trump has asked a Georgia appeals court to overturn a ruling allowing Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis to continue prosecuting the election fraud case against him due to her affair scandal involving a former colleague. Trump and his co-defendants seek to have Willis disqualified over a conflict of interest and misuse of public funds. The move is likely to cause further delays in the trial, which had been scheduled for August, and the Georgia Court of Appeals must decide whether to take the case on before the trial within 45 days.
"Trump Continues Legal Battle to Remove Fani Willis from Georgia Case"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by The New York Times
Lawyers for former President Donald Trump and his co-defendants are appealing a judge's ruling that allowed Atlanta prosecutor Fani T. Willis to remain on the Georgia election interference case, arguing that her entire office should be disqualified due to a romantic relationship between Willis and a subordinate prosecutor. The judge had previously ruled that Willis could stay on the case if the subordinate prosecutor stepped aside, but the defense maintains that this is not enough to restore the public's faith in the integrity of the judicial system.
"Trump and Co-Defendants Continue Appeals to Remove Fani Willis from Georgia Election Case"
Originally Published 1 year ago — by The Independent
Donald Trump and his co-defendants have appealed a judge's decision to keep Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis on the Georgia election interference case, claiming she should not be allowed to preside over the case due to concerns about impartiality. The appeal comes after a ruling allowing Willis and her office to continue pursuing the case, provided her former partner and prosecutor on the case, Nathan Wade, resigned. The defendants argue that the judge's decision lacked appellate guidance and that Willis's romantic relationship with Wade raised ethical concerns, leading to public mistrust in the judicial system.