Jack Smith, former special counsel, testified to a House committee that he had proof beyond a reasonable doubt in cases against Trump related to classified documents and election interference, denying political bias and asserting no communication with President Biden about the cases, while highlighting the potential consequences of unpunished election meddling.
Former special counsel Jack Smith's deposition reveals key insights into his investigation of Trump, including his stance that the Jan. 6 attack was Trump’s responsibility, his legal justification for subpoenaing congressional phone records, evidence of Trump obstructing the recovery of classified documents, his claim that he would have investigated any president, and his refusal to disclose details about Patel's interview due to a court injunction.
The US Congress released a 255-page transcript and video of former Special Counsel Jack Smith's testimony defending his investigations into Donald Trump, focusing on Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election and illegally retain classified documents, with Smith asserting that the charges were based on substantial evidence and that Trump sought retribution against his investigators.
Former special counsel Jack Smith testified before the House Judiciary Committee, asserting that his investigations into Donald Trump would have led to convictions for mishandling classified documents and attempting to overturn the 2020 election if not for Trump's reelection, which led to the cases being dropped due to DOJ policy. Smith emphasized his decisions were based solely on facts and law, regardless of political considerations.
Special Counsel Jack Smith defended his investigations into Donald Trump before a closed-door House Judiciary Committee session, asserting that his prosecutorial decisions were based solely on evidence and not political considerations. He confirmed that his team found strong evidence of Trump’s involvement in efforts to overturn the 2020 election, as well as willful retention of classified documents and obstruction of justice, leading to two criminal indictments. Smith emphasized his commitment to pursuing justice regardless of political affiliation, despite accusations of political bias from Trump and his allies.
Former special counsel Jack Smith testified before Congress that he has proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election and repeatedly tried to obstruct justice by hiding classified documents, leading to two indictments that were later dismissed. Smith emphasized his commitment to following the law regardless of political implications and addressed criticisms of his investigation, highlighting the importance of accountability and the rule of law.
Jack Smith testified in a closed-door deposition regarding investigations into Trump, facing political and legal challenges, with his legal team defending his record amid partisan scrutiny and restrictions on disclosure.
Jack Smith, former Justice Department special counsel, testified to lawmakers that his team found 'proof beyond a reasonable doubt' of Trump's criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election and his mishandling of classified documents, emphasizing his decision-making was based solely on law and facts. The testimony was part of a closed-door deposition related to investigations into Trump, including analysis of GOP lawmakers' phone records, and Smith expressed willingness for an open hearing.
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith testified before Congress about his investigations into Donald Trump, asserting evidence of a criminal scheme to overturn the 2020 election and mishandling classified documents, amid partisan criticism and political tensions.
Former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith testified privately before the House Judiciary Committee, asserting that his team found strong evidence that Donald Trump conspired to overturn the 2020 election and unlawfully hoarded classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, emphasizing his decision-making was based solely on law and facts, regardless of political implications.
John Bolton's investigation for mishandling classified information is compared to other high-profile cases involving officials like Trump, Biden, Clinton, and Petraeus, highlighting similarities and differences in legal outcomes and conduct.
Former national security adviser John Bolton was indicted on 18 charges related to mishandling classified documents, including transmitting sensitive information via personal email and messaging apps, with potential sentences up to 10 years per count. The charges follow a search of his home and relate to documents referencing weapons of mass destruction and foreign policy details. Bolton, once a critic of Trump, has a complex history with the administration, including having his security clearance revoked. The case is part of broader legal actions involving former officials and political figures.
Federal prosecutors in Maryland are expected to seek a grand jury indictment of former Trump adviser John Bolton for mishandling classified documents, amid ongoing investigations into political figures and their handling of sensitive information.
John Bolton, a former national security adviser and outspoken critic of Donald Trump, is expected to be charged soon with federal crimes related to the handling of classified documents, following FBI searches of his home and office as part of a national security investigation.
The FBI found classified documents in John Bolton's DC office, dating back to his time in the Bush administration, prompting a thorough review. The search was authorized by a federal magistrate, the same judge involved in high-profile cases like Donald Trump's indictment. The incident occurs amid ongoing political and legal scrutiny of former officials, including Trump and Biden, over handling of classified materials.