All articles tagged with #transfer rules
The NCAA's recent decision to grant eligibility to international player James Nnaji, who was drafted into the NBA, has sparked controversy and could significantly alter college basketball and NBA draft dynamics, including potential legal battles and changes in player transfer and return policies.
A major legal case has been launched against Fifa by Justice for Players, claiming that Fifa's transfer regulations have unlawfully restricted player mobility and caused significant financial losses for footballers, potentially leading to a transformative shift in football transfer laws similar to the 1995 Bosman ruling.
FIFA has confirmed that teams participating in the 2025 Club World Cup must arrive in the U.S. three to five days before their first match, leaving players with no rest between international qualifiers and the tournament. The 32-team event, starting June 15, has sparked concerns over player workload, with top coaches and players voicing their discontent. FIFA's regulations also address transfer issues, allowing special windows and mid-tournament squad changes. The tournament will conclude on July 13, with prize money and draw details yet to be announced.
The NCAA has agreed to permanently end its transfer eligibility restrictions following a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, allowing athletes to transfer without penalty and restoring a year of eligibility for those affected since 2019-20. This resolves a federal antitrust lawsuit challenging the NCAA's previous rule requiring athletes to sit out a year if they transferred more than once.
The Division I Council has unanimously approved changes to transfer rules, allowing student-athletes who meet certain academic eligibility requirements to be immediately eligible at their new school, regardless of previous transfers. Undergraduate and graduate transfer student-athletes must meet specific academic criteria to be eligible, and are expected to enter the Transfer Portal within their sport's notification-of-transfer windows. The Division I Board of Directors will ratify the rules later this month, and may also consider creating a Transfer Academic Progress Rate and a Graduation Passport to track academic progress and graduation outcomes for transferring student-athletes.
The Department of Justice and several states, including Minnesota, Mississippi, Virginia, and the District of Columbia, have joined a lawsuit against the NCAA's transfer eligibility rule, arguing that it restricts college athletes' ability to control their education and sell their image and likeness. The lawsuit challenges the NCAA rule that requires Division I athletes making a second transfer to wait a year before competing in their sport, and a preliminary injunction has been issued against the NCAA, allowing athletes to compete without fear of retaliation.
The U.S. Department of Justice has joined a multi-state lawsuit challenging the NCAA's transfer eligibility rules, specifically focusing on the requirement for multi-time transfers to sit out a year before returning to competition. The lawsuit argues that this rule violates the Sherman Antitrust Act by limiting athletes' ability to control their education and sell their name, image, and likeness. The addition of the DOJ and four new attorneys general signals a continued push for a permanent rule change by the NCAA or a court directive that would supersede the NCAA's rule, despite recent changes made by the organization.
The NCAA has announced that it will allow college athletes to transfer a second time without penalty through the end of the 2023-24 school year. This decision comes after a federal court ruled against the NCAA's rule preventing immediate eligibility after a second transfer. The ruling prompted the NCAA to convert the temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction. The NCAA's decision reflects the changing landscape of college athletics, as courts and state governments have been increasingly favorable to players' rights.
The NCAA has announced that it will allow college athletes to transfer a second time without penalty through the end of the current season, including spring sports. This decision comes after a federal court ruled against the NCAA's rule preventing immediate eligibility after a second transfer. The ruling gave players a 14-day window to transfer without penalty, and the NCAA has now extended this allowance for the remainder of the academic year. The NCAA's decision follows a federal suit filed by several states, claiming that the transfer restrictions violated antitrust law. This move reflects the NCAA's ongoing transition period as it adapts to court decisions and state laws favoring players' rights.
Utah guard Deivon Smith and BYU forward Marcus Adams Jr., along with other multiple-time transfers, have been granted immediate eligibility for the remainder of the college basketball season. This comes after a temporary restraining order was converted to an injunction, allowing these players to compete without restrictions. The NCAA clarified that the redshirt eligibility rule still applies, and a preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for December 27. Smith, a two-time transfer, had his waiver denied previously, while Adams was awaiting news on his transfer waiver.
The NCAA has reached an agreement with a group of states that will allow athletes to play immediately for the rest of the season, despite a temporary restraining order filed against the organization. The ruling applies to athletes who were previously denied the chance to play immediately after transferring a second time. The agreement will be in effect until the end of the 2023-24 NCAA championship season and must be approved by a federal court. This decision paves the way for Utah's Deivon Smith and BYU's Marcus Adams Jr. to potentially play immediately.
A federal judge in West Virginia has granted a temporary restraining order against the NCAA, allowing immediate eligibility for college athletes who are currently required to sit out game competition due to the NCAA's multi-time transfer year in residence requirements. The order is in effect for the next 14 days, during which impacted athletes can participate in games. The judge's ruling also restricts the NCAA's ability to penalize universities for playing these athletes. The decision extends to all NCAA athletes and is not limited to specific states. Another hearing will be held on December 27 to determine whether a preliminary injunction will be issued.
A judge in West Virginia has issued a temporary restraining order granting immediate eligibility to college athletes who have transferred more than once, potentially leading to a permanent change in NCAA transfer rules. The ruling suspends the year-in-residence requirement for multiple-time transfers for a 14-day period, impacting active transfers in winter sports. A preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for December 27, where a more permanent ruling is expected. The decision stems from lawsuits filed by a basketball player seeking eligibility and seven state attorney generals challenging the NCAA's transfer policy.
The Division I Legislative Committee has approved changes to the guidelines for reinstating the eligibility of student-athletes who commit sports wagering violations. The new guidelines take into account the cumulative dollar value of the wagers and provide specific penalties based on the amount. Student-athletes who engage in activities to influence game outcomes or wager on their own games face potential permanent loss of eligibility. The changes aim to modernize penalties in light of the widespread legalization of sports wagering. Additionally, the Division I Council has made modifications to transfer rules, allowing transfers to continue receiving scholarships in certain circumstances and proposing a reduction in the notification-of-transfer window from 60 to 30 days.