Guillermo del Toro expresses strong opposition to generative AI, stating he'd 'rather die' than use it, while reflecting on his childhood, his artistic inspirations, and his philosophical views on death and life.
A growing movement of workers, students, and creatives are resisting AI due to concerns about its impact on critical thinking, reliance, and authenticity, despite widespread usage and integration into daily life, highlighting a cultural tension around AI adoption.
Recent developments and expert opinions suggest that achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) with current Large Language Models (LLMs) is unlikely in the near future, as fundamental challenges like distribution shift remain unresolved and recent AI advancements have fallen short of expectations.
As AI and generative models like ChatGPT become more prevalent, a growing movement of critics and creators advocate for slowing AI development, emphasizing human-made media, authentic interactions, and offline activities to preserve human uniqueness and counteract AI's influence.
The article debates the realistic timeline and definition of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), criticizing claims that AGI is imminent and highlighting the current limitations of large language models (LLMs). It emphasizes that LLMs are good at language but poor at logic and spatial reasoning, and argues that true AGI would require AI to outperform a small percentage of human specialists across all tasks. The discussion also touches on societal impacts, the nature of intelligence, and the challenges of defining and achieving AGI, with many experts expressing skepticism about the near-term arrival of true AGI.
Despite being a top IT priority for many companies, a Boston Consulting Group poll reveals that a majority of C-suite executives are ambivalent or dissatisfied with their organization's progress on Generative AI (GenAI), citing talent shortages, unclear roadmaps, and a lack of strategy for responsible deployment. While GenAI is still seen as a priority, skepticism remains high, with concerns about productivity gains and worries over potential bad or illegal decision-making and data security compromises.
Novelist Lincoln Michel critiques the practicality and ethical implications of generative AI, highlighting its inconsistencies and failures despite passing standardized tests. He questions the hype around AI's capabilities, pointing out the technology's potential to plateau and the unethical use of artists' work without compensation. Michel suggests that AI-generated content may not be as desirable or successful as promised, citing the lack of consumer interest and the recent apology from Sports Illustrated for using AI-written articles. He expresses doubt that AI will replace human creativity and foresees a future filled with unwanted AI-generated content.
Charlie Munger, the legendary investor who recently passed away, expressed skepticism about the hype surrounding artificial intelligence (AI). Recent evidence suggests he may have been right, at least for now. AI technology remains expensive and unprofitable, with companies like OpenAI facing internal conflicts and questions about their valuation. Many AI startups rely on venture capital funding, raising concerns about the quality of investments. Furthermore, the technology has yet to fully deliver on its promises, with issues such as copyright lawsuits and limitations in generalization capabilities. Munger's skepticism about AI appears to be justified, as human intelligence continues to be reliable.