"Examining the Impact of AI on Privacy, Time Efficiency, and Risk Management"

TL;DR Summary
Novelist Lincoln Michel critiques the practicality and ethical implications of generative AI, highlighting its inconsistencies and failures despite passing standardized tests. He questions the hype around AI's capabilities, pointing out the technology's potential to plateau and the unethical use of artists' work without compensation. Michel suggests that AI-generated content may not be as desirable or successful as promised, citing the lack of consumer interest and the recent apology from Sports Illustrated for using AI-written articles. He expresses doubt that AI will replace human creativity and foresees a future filled with unwanted AI-generated content.
Topics:business#ai-ethics#ai-in-society#ai-limitations#ai-skepticism#generative-ai#technology-opinion
- Will AI Just Waste Everyone's Time? Slashdot
- How a Professional Risk Manager Views Threats Posed by AI Bloomberg
- A.I.'s Groundhog Day Slate
- Top lawmaker on AI working group says privacy regs should be a priority for Congress Fox News
- Audiobook Review: ‘The Coming Wave,’ by Mustafa Suleyman With Michael Bhaskar The New York Times
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
3 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
85%
600 → 93 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Slashdot