"Controversial Study: Universe Has No Dark Matter and Is 27 Billion Years Old"

TL;DR Summary
A new paper by University of Ottawa physics professor Rajendra Gupta challenges the existence of dark matter, suggesting that the universe is twice as old as current models suggest and doesn't require dark matter to exist. Gupta's theory, which builds on his previous work about the universe's age, proposes a revised model based on a "covarying coupling constant" and the tired light hypothesis, arguing that dark matter doesn't have to be part of the equation at all. This controversial claim directly contradicts prevailing theories and is expected to face pushback from Gupta's peers.
Topics:science#astronomyphysics#astrophysics#controversial-theory#cosmological-constant#dark-matter#universe-age
- New Paper Claims Dark Matter Doesn't Exist at All Futurism
- Study: Dark matter does not exist and the universe is 27 billion years old Earth.com
- Controversial new theory of gravity rules out need for dark matter The Guardian
- Dark matter isn't real, standard model must be replaced, scientist says The Jerusalem Post
- Physicist Claims Universe Has No Dark Matter And Is 27 Billion Years Old ScienceAlert
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
2 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
80%
458 → 93 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Futurism