"The Battle for Democracy: The Supreme Court's Role in Curbing Bureaucratic Power"

TL;DR Summary
The case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, brought by New England fishermen against Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, may weaken Chevron deference, which has empowered the administrative state. The debate centers on who should have the power to decide laws - unelected judges or bureaucrats. The author argues that unelected bureaucrats should not have the authority to create laws, and that Chevron deference incentivizes vague laws and presidential abuse of power, posing a real threat to democracy.
Topics:nation#administrative-state#chevron-deference#democracy#government-regulation#politics#supreme-court
- You Can't Defend 'Democracy' And The Administrative State The Federalist
- The Supreme Court Could Soon Fix 40-Year Chevron Mistake—But If It Doesn't, Freedom Will Take A Hit Forbes
- How ‘Chevron’ May Fall National Review
- Opinion | Rein In the Bureaucrats and Put Congress to Work The Wall Street Journal
- Editorial Roundup: United States - The Washington Post The Washington Post
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
91%
843 → 77 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Federalist