Supreme Court's Election Rulings: A Mixed Bag of Victories and Concerns

The Supreme Court has surprised voting rights groups with recent decisions that uphold protections for minority voters and limit state lawmakers' power to set voting rules. The decisions, while victories for maintaining the status quo, also set the stage for future showdowns and unresolved questions. The first decision rejects the argument that state legislatures have unchecked power to set election rules, allowing courts to review laws for consistency with state constitutions. The second decision upholds the interpretation of the Voting Rights Act, requiring mapmakers to consider race but not make it the predominant factor in drawing districts. However, both decisions leave room for future challenges and uncertainties, potentially leading to more litigation.
- Supreme Court is siding with voting groups but some see warning signs USA TODAY
- Supreme Court rejects GOP claim that state lawmakers have full power over elections Los Angeles Times
- Here's what the Supreme Court's new election law ruling means for Pa. | Patrick Beaty Pennsylvania Capital-Star
- Opinion | The Supreme Court's Rejection of a Disputed Legal Theory on Elections The New York Times
- Opinion: Another not-as-bad-as-it-could-be decision from America’s highest court CNN
Reading Insights
0
1
4 min
vs 5 min read
87%
837 → 112 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on USA TODAY