Tag

Federal Election Interference

All articles tagged with #federal election interference

"US Appeals Court Denies Trump's Immunity Claim in Election Interference Case"
politics2 years ago

"US Appeals Court Denies Trump's Immunity Claim in Election Interference Case"

The U.S. Court of Appeals rejected former President Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity in his federal election interference case, stating that he is now "citizen Trump" and subject to the same defenses as any other criminal defendant. The judges emphasized that a president does not have unbounded authority to commit crimes or violate citizens' voting rights. Trump plans to appeal the decision, arguing that without immunity, every future president leaving office could be immediately indicted by the opposing party. The case has been postponed, and Trump has until Feb. 12 to ask the Supreme Court to stay the ruling and take up the issue on an emergency basis.

"Federal Judge Delays Start of Trump's Election Interference Trial"
legalcourt-proceedings2 years ago

"Federal Judge Delays Start of Trump's Election Interference Trial"

The federal election interference trial of former President Donald Trump has been postponed as the judge awaits a decision on Trump's claim of presidential immunity. Trump faces charges of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results through various means. In addition to this trial, he also faces upcoming legal proceedings in his classified documents case, the Georgia election interference case, and a hush-money case brought by the Manhattan district attorney in New York.

"Federal Appeals Court Upholds Gag Order in Trump Cases, Supreme Court Next"
legalcourt-news2 years ago

"Federal Appeals Court Upholds Gag Order in Trump Cases, Supreme Court Next"

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has declined to rehear former President Donald Trump's appeal of the gag order imposed on him in the federal election interference case, leaving the Supreme Court as his final option. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan imposed the gag order on Trump last year after he made disparaging comments about her, special counsel Jack Smith, and potential witnesses in the case. The former president has challenged the order in court since it was issued, and a three-judge panel of the same appeals court is expected to soon issue a ruling on Trump's effort to dismiss the federal election interference case against him through a claim of presidential immunity.

"Federal Appeals Court Upholds Gag Order in Trump's Election Interference Cases"
legal-politics2 years ago

"Federal Appeals Court Upholds Gag Order in Trump's Election Interference Cases"

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has denied former President Donald Trump's appeal of the limited gag order placed on him in his federal election interference case, allowing him to potentially seek appeal to the Supreme Court. The gag order prohibits Trump from publicly targeting the special counsel, his staff, and court personnel. Trump had appealed the order after making social media comments regarding his former chief of staff, Mark Meadows. Trump has pleaded not guilty to charges of election interference and has denounced the charges as political.

"Legal Maneuvers: Unveiling Jack Smith's Strategy Against Trump's Supreme Court Appeal"
politics2 years ago

"Legal Maneuvers: Unveiling Jack Smith's Strategy Against Trump's Supreme Court Appeal"

Special Counsel Jack Smith has enlisted the help of Michael Dreeben, a renowned legal expert, to counter Trump's claims of immunity in the federal election interference case. Dreeben, known for his extensive experience arguing before the Supreme Court, is seen as a formidable opponent to Trump's legal team. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has already rejected Trump's immunity arguments, stating that former presidents are not exempt from federal criminal liability. Smith's swift petition to the Supreme Court has prompted the justices to consider whether Trump can be immune from prosecution while in office. Trump's legal team has until December 20th to respond to the petition.

"Judge Halts Trump's Federal Election Interference Case, Appeals Process Underway"
legal2 years ago

"Judge Halts Trump's Federal Election Interference Case, Appeals Process Underway"

The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's federal election interference case has put a hold on the proceedings while the appeals process takes place. Trump's lawyers requested the stay, but special counsel Jack Smith's team opposed it, wanting certain filings to continue. The delay does not prevent the enforcement of protective orders, Trump's conditions of release, or the limited gag order. The special counsel has asked the Supreme Court to intervene and resolve the matter quickly. Trump has pleaded not guilty to charges of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results and has denied any wrongdoing.

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Trump Gag Order in Election Interference Case
law-and-politics2 years ago

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Trump Gag Order in Election Interference Case

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has largely upheld a gag order in the federal election interference case against former President Trump, preventing him from making public statements about potential witnesses, attorneys, and court personnel. However, Trump is now allowed to criticize special counsel Jack Smith but not his team members. The court emphasized the importance of the rule of law and stated that Trump, as an indicted criminal defendant, must stand trial under the same procedures as others. Trump is expected to appeal the ruling, which could go before the full D.C. Circuit Court or the Supreme Court. The court also signaled resistance to Trump's efforts to delay his trial, stating that it would be counterproductive and burden the judicial process. Trump's trial is scheduled to begin on March 4.

Trump's Motions Denied, Supreme Court Rejects, Court Rules Trump Can Be Sued
politics2 years ago

Trump's Motions Denied, Supreme Court Rejects, Court Rules Trump Can Be Sued

A federal judge has denied two of former President Donald Trump's motions to dismiss the federal election interference case against him. The judge ruled that presidents do not have absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for acts within their official responsibilities unless first impeached and convicted in the Senate. The judge also stated that Trump's indictment does not violate the First Amendment. Trump's lawyers had filed several motions to dismiss the case on constitutional grounds, including the First Amendment, double jeopardy, and due process. The trial is scheduled to begin in March.

Trump's Legal Troubles Mount as Judge Denies Immunity Claims and Election Interference Defense
law-and-politics2 years ago

Trump's Legal Troubles Mount as Judge Denies Immunity Claims and Election Interference Defense

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has rejected former President Donald Trump's claim of immunity from criminal liability for actions taken while in office, denying a motion to dismiss his federal election interference case. Chutkan stated that being a former president does not grant immunity from federal criminal liability and dismissed arguments that the indictment violated Trump's free speech rights. This ruling comes after a federal appeals court also struck down a similar immunity claim in civil lawsuits related to the January 6 Capitol insurrection. The trial for the federal election interference case is scheduled for March, but Trump's defense team is expected to appeal, potentially delaying the trial beyond the 2024 election.

Trump's Gag Order Battle: Implications for Federal Election Interference
politics2 years ago

Trump's Gag Order Battle: Implications for Federal Election Interference

A three-judge panel in a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., is considering whether to loosen a gag order against former President Donald Trump in a federal election interference case. The judges appeared skeptical of both sides during arguments on reinstating the order, which prevented Trump from making inflammatory comments against prosecutors, potential witnesses, and court staff. The outcome of the hearing will determine what Trump can and cannot say as the trial date approaches. The gag order was initially imposed by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan and later reinstated after a previous appeal. Trump has continued to deny any wrongdoing and has criticized those involved in the case.

"Trump Demands Televised Coverage of Federal Election Interference Case"
politics2 years ago

"Trump Demands Televised Coverage of Federal Election Interference Case"

Former President Donald Trump is pushing for his federal election interference trial in Washington to be televised, joining media outlets in arguing that the American public should be able to watch the historic case unfold. The Justice Department opposes the effort, citing long-standing nationwide policy against cameras in federal courtrooms. Trump's lawyers argue that the trial is politically motivated and should be televised so that the public can see it as a "dreamt-up unconstitutional charade." The trial is scheduled to begin on March 4 and is seen as a significant legal threat to Trump's political fortunes.

Federal Judge Reinstates Gag Order on Trump in Election Interference Case
politics2 years ago

Federal Judge Reinstates Gag Order on Trump in Election Interference Case

A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has reinstated a narrow gag order that limits former President Donald Trump's public speech about the special counsel's 2020 election interference case against him. The order bars Trump from speaking about prosecutors, court staff, and potential witnesses, but allows him to continue criticizing the charges against him, the Justice Department, and the Biden administration. Trump's attorneys argue that the gag order violates his constitutional rights as a candidate running for office. Prosecutors have urged the judge to make the gag order a permanent condition of Trump's post-indictment release. Trump has been charged with four federal counts tied to his alleged conduct after the 2020 presidential election and has pleaded not guilty.

Federal Judge Reinstates Gag Order on Trump in Election Subversion Case
legalcriminal-justice2 years ago

Federal Judge Reinstates Gag Order on Trump in Election Subversion Case

A gag order in the federal election interference case against former President Donald Trump is back in effect after the presiding judge lifted her pause on the order. The order prohibits Trump from making statements about potential witnesses or disparaging comments about the prosecutors, court staff, or support personnel. Special counsel Jack Smith's team requested the gag order to protect the trial's integrity and the jury pool from being influenced by Trump's statements. Trump's legal team plans to appeal the decision, claiming it infringes on his First Amendment rights. Trump has frequently alleged, without evidence, that these cases are part of President Biden's attempts to hinder his potential presidential nomination.

Judge Reinstates Gag Order on Trump in Federal Election Interference Case
politics2 years ago

Judge Reinstates Gag Order on Trump in Federal Election Interference Case

A judge reinstated the gag order on former President Donald Trump in the federal criminal case charging him with conspiring to overturn the 2020 election results. The order prohibits Trump from attacking prosecutors, court staff, and potential trial witnesses. The judge denied Trump's request to suspend the gag order indefinitely while his lawyers appealed. Prosecutors argued that Trump's inflammatory statements, including attacks on special counsel Jack Smith and comments about the testimony of his former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, were exactly the type of behavior the order was designed to prevent. The back and forth over the gag order has been a contentious legal battle, with Trump claiming his first amendment rights were being infringed upon.

DOJ Rejects Trump's Immunity Claims in Election Case
politics2 years ago

DOJ Rejects Trump's Immunity Claims in Election Case

The Justice Department has urged a judge to reject former President Donald Trump's attempt to dismiss the federal election interference case against him, asserting that "no one is above the law." Trump's legal team argued for presidential immunity, but prosecutors argued that such immunity is temporary and does not extend to a former president. They warned that granting immunity would undermine accountability and shield presidents who commit crimes. Trump faces criminal charges in multiple jurisdictions, and his legal problems may reflect his unprecedented behavior.