"Uncovering Sloppiness and Misconduct: The Impact on Dana-Farber's Reputation"

TL;DR Summary
Biologist Sholto David has made it his mission to find flaws in scientific papers, often facing resistance from academics and journal editors. However, his efforts recently led to the Harvard-affiliated Dana-Farber Cancer Institute announcing retractions and corrections for several research papers after David raised concerns. He has flagged about 2,000 papers on PubPeer, mostly due to potential image manipulation, and believes that many errors in scientific research are due to sloppiness. While he does not want to create a hostile environment for scientists, he questions how many errors are acceptable before it becomes something more concerning.
Topics:world#biology#dana-farber-cancer-institute#image-manipulation#research-integrity#science#scientific-papers
- ‘A lot of it is sloppiness’: the biologist who finds flaws in scientific papers The Guardian
- Allegations of research misconduct roil Dana-Farber Cancer Institute NBC News
- Stop Hocusing Your Western Blots, Maybe Science
- How Dana-Farber’s scandal could hurt its reputation Modern Healthcare
- Daily briefing: Meet the data sleuth who spurred the Dana-Farber retractions Nature.com
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
88%
794 → 96 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Guardian