"Uncovering Sloppiness and Misconduct: The Impact on Dana-Farber's Reputation"

1 min read
Source: The Guardian
"Uncovering Sloppiness and Misconduct: The Impact on Dana-Farber's Reputation"
Photo: The Guardian
TL;DR Summary

Biologist Sholto David has made it his mission to find flaws in scientific papers, often facing resistance from academics and journal editors. However, his efforts recently led to the Harvard-affiliated Dana-Farber Cancer Institute announcing retractions and corrections for several research papers after David raised concerns. He has flagged about 2,000 papers on PubPeer, mostly due to potential image manipulation, and believes that many errors in scientific research are due to sloppiness. While he does not want to create a hostile environment for scientists, he questions how many errors are acceptable before it becomes something more concerning.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

1

Time Saved

3 min

vs 4 min read

Condensed

88%

79496 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on The Guardian