Supreme Court sides with Prince estate in Warhol copyright case

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court ruled that Andy Warhol's silkscreen prints of Prince infringed on the copyright held by photographer Lynn Goldsmith. The court ruled 7-2 that Warhol's images did not constitute "fair use" under copyright law, a decision that will have considerable impact on various creative industries. The ruling is beneficial to people who own copyrighted content upon which other works are based, and could have a negative impact upon entities that make new works based on existing material.
- Supreme Court rules against Warhol Foundation in copyright fight over Prince images NBC News
- Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol in copyright dispute over Prince portrait CNN
- Supreme Court Rules Against Andy Warhol on Prince Photo The New York Times
- Supreme Court rules against Andy Warhol Foundation in copyright case over Prince photo CNBC
- Supreme Court rules against Warhol Foundation in Prince photo copyright case The Washington Post
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
92%
967 → 78 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on NBC News