"The Limitations of Logic and Reasoning in Science"

TL;DR Summary
Throughout history, humanity has used both top-down (a priori) and bottom-up (a posteriori) reasoning to gain knowledge about the world. However, science has shown that no amount of logical reasoning can substitute for empirical knowledge. Three examples illustrate how logic and reasoning alone are insufficient in science: the nature of light, the age of the Earth, and Einstein's cosmological constant. These cases demonstrate that the only way to gain meaningful knowledge of the Universe is by asking quantitative questions that can be answered through experiment and observation.
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
13 min
vs 14 min read
Condensed
97%
2,685 → 87 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Big Think