"The Limitations of Logic and Reasoning in Science"

1 min read
Source: Big Think
"The Limitations of Logic and Reasoning in Science"
Photo: Big Think
TL;DR Summary

Throughout history, humanity has used both top-down (a priori) and bottom-up (a posteriori) reasoning to gain knowledge about the world. However, science has shown that no amount of logical reasoning can substitute for empirical knowledge. Three examples illustrate how logic and reasoning alone are insufficient in science: the nature of light, the age of the Earth, and Einstein's cosmological constant. These cases demonstrate that the only way to gain meaningful knowledge of the Universe is by asking quantitative questions that can be answered through experiment and observation.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

0

Time Saved

13 min

vs 14 min read

Condensed

97%

2,68587 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on Big Think