The Ethics Controversy Surrounding Justice Samuel Alito

ProPublica's recent report on Justice Samuel Alito's acceptance of a gift of a fancy fishing trip to Alaska from right-wing billionaire Paul Singer has exposed the deep and long-standing corruption of the conservative justices on the Supreme Court. The report shows how Alito allegedly broke the law and violated all manner of judicial ethics by accepting the gift. The conservative justices, who are a majority on the court, have strong ties to the right-wing Federalist Society and its former head/current board member Leonard Leo, who is known for hooking up justices with billionaires who shower them with fancy vacations as gifts. The justices' sensitivity to criticisms and their inability to handle criticism is a dominant personality trait, making them appear whiny.
- Samuel Alito scandal shows why conservative justices on the Supreme Court are so whiny Yahoo News
- Sen. Whitehouse: Alito's excuses are 'so preposterous they're almost incriminating' MSNBC
- Justice Samuel Alito is speaking out in public The Washington Post
- Should Justice Alito Have Recused Himself? - WSJ The Wall Street Journal
- Editorial: Once again, an ethics controversy further diminishes a damaged Supreme Court St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Reading Insights
0
1
8 min
vs 9 min read
93%
1,645 → 121 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Yahoo News