"Supreme Court's Stance on Free Speech and Gender Identity Sparks Controversy"

TL;DR Summary
During oral arguments in the social media censorship case Murthy v. Missouri, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed concerns over the First Amendment restraining the government, suggesting that the government should have the power to dictate what can be posted on social media, particularly in times of crisis like the COVID pandemic. Her comments have sparked criticism from Rep. Jim Jordan and others, who argue that her view goes against the intended purpose of the First Amendment and could lead to government censorship of political speech.
Topics:nation#first-amendment#government-power#ketanji-brown-jackson#politics#social-media-censorship#supreme-court
- Biden's Only SCOTUS Pick Can't Define 'Woman,' Objects To The First Amendment The Daily Wire
- Analysis | The Supreme Court looks unlikely to overhaul online speech after all The Washington Post
- The Supreme Court can dismantle the censorship-industrial complex The Hill
- Justice Jackson ripped for worrying about the First Amendment 'hamstringing' government: 'Literally the point' Fox News
- The Supreme Court's conservatives are annoyed at the 5th Circuit. Slate
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
3 min
vs 3 min read
Condensed
86%
589 → 85 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Daily Wire