Supreme Court Ruling Denies Thousands of Inmates Chance for Shorter Sentences

The Supreme Court narrowly interpreted a provision of the First Step Act, a landmark criminal justice law, siding with the government in a decision likely to limit the number of federal prisoners eligible for reduced sentences for nonviolent drug crimes. The 6-3 decision, not split along ideological lines, concluded that a criminal defendant must meet specific criminal history conditions to qualify for relief, with failure to meet any criteria rendering a prisoner ineligible. The case focused on eligibility for shorter prison sentences under the bipartisan 2018 legislation, and the majority opinion, written by Justice Elena Kagan, adopted a tone of an English teacher, focusing on the interpretation of grammar in the law.
- Supreme Court Sides With Government on Reduced Sentencing Law The New York Times
- US Supreme Court says thousands of drug offenders can't seek shorter sentences Reuters
- The word 'and' could land defendants with longer sentences in Supreme Court ruling The Independent
- Supreme Court denies 'thousands' of inmates a chance at shorter sentences Yahoo! Voices
- Thousands of inmates could be denied a chance at shorter sentences after Supreme Court ruling AOL
Reading Insights
0
1
1 min
vs 2 min read
71%
387 → 112 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times