"Courts Exercise Discretion Amid Controversy Over 'Judge-Shopping' Policy"

TL;DR Summary
The U.S. Judicial Conference issued guidance on the federal judiciary's new policy to prevent "judge-shopping," stating that courts have discretion in implementing the policy. The policy aims to randomly assign cases that could impact state or federal policies to a wider pool of district court judges. This move comes after criticism from top Republicans in Congress, who called it an "unforced error" and urged the Judicial Conference to reconsider. The practice of "judge-shopping" has been criticized by Democrats, with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer stating that it allows plaintiffs to target sympathetic judges.
Topics:nation#federal-judiciary#gop-backlash#judge-shopping#politics#random-case-assignment#us-judicial-conference
- Judicial body says courts have discretion on new 'judge-shopping' policy after GOP backlash NBC News
- How John Roberts just won a victory over rogue, lawless Trump judges. Slate
- Federal courts move to restrict 'judge shopping,' which got attention after abortion medication case The Associated Press
- Why Republicans are scrambling to condemn ‘judge shopping’ reforms MSNBC
- Mitch McConnell Urges Courts To Ignore New Rules Meant To Prevent 'Judge-Shopping' HuffPost
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
74%
364 → 93 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on NBC News