"Supreme Court's Phony Case: Uncovered"

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in cases aiming to undermine federal agencies' power by overturning Chevron deference, which requires courts to defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous law. The cases involve a defunct program, but conservative legal activists seized on them to challenge Chevron deference. The Court's focus on this issue, rather than the original statutory interpretation question, has raised concerns about the justices' agenda and the potential impact on federal agency authority.
Topics:nation#administrative-state#chevron-deference#federal-agencies#jurisprudence#statutory-interpretation#supreme-court
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
92%
927 → 77 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Slate