States Rally Against 3M's Controversial Water Contamination Settlement

TL;DR Summary
Twenty-two attorneys general are opposing a proposed $10.3 billion settlement over the contamination of U.S. public drinking water systems with PFAS chemicals by manufacturer 3M. The attorneys general argue that the settlement does not adequately account for the damage caused by 3M and could shift liability from the company to water providers. The deal also fails to give individual water suppliers enough time to determine if the settlement would cover their costs of removing the chemicals. PFAS, known as "forever chemicals," have been linked to health problems. The attorneys general are urging the federal court to reject the settlement.
- 22 attorneys general oppose 3M settlement over water systems contamination with 'forever chemicals' The Associated Press
- California-led coalition takes legal action against 3M’s deal with PFAS-polluted water providers The Hill
- DC AG and others oppose 3M settlement over water contamination with 'forever chemicals' WJLA
- UPDATE 2-California, other states move to block 3M's $10.3 billion PFAS deal Yahoo Finance
- Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: Will States Object to 3M's $12.5B Settlement? Big Tech Compares Casino App Coins to Pac-Man Ghosts Law.com
- View Full Coverage on Google News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
85%
651 → 99 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Associated Press