Two Health Announcements, Diverging Paths to Trust

TL;DR Summary
Emily Oster weighs two January HHS moves under RFK Jr.: a controversial overhaul of the childhood vaccine schedule and a streamlined set of dietary guidelines. She argues the vaccine changes lack new safety evidence and risk eroding trust, while the dietary guidelines largely reflect prior data and could improve public understanding if communicated clearly. The piece underscores how trust in public health is fragile, and linking skeptical vaccine messaging with seemingly reasonable dietary guidance creates a difficult messaging environment.
- Let’s Be Honest About Public Health Guidance The Dispatch
- The new US food pyramid is scientifically questionable, and upends decades of trusted public health advice The Conversation
- The Strange Paradox in the RFK Jr. Diet Guidelines Nautilus | Science Connected
- What the new nutrition guidelines get wrong about fat Science News
- New US Dietary Guidelines: A Kidney Dietitian Weighs In Docwire News
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
11
Time Saved
5 min
vs 6 min read
Condensed
93%
1,168 → 79 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Dispatch