Measles, Narrative Truth, and Persuasion: Bruenig’s Hypothetical Essay

TL;DR Summary
An interview analyzes Elizabeth Bruenig's The Atlantic piece that presents a hypothetical, heavily researched measles narrative in second person, blending fiction and journalism to show the disease's biology, public-health response, and long-term risks like SSPE; Bruenig discusses her research, why she framed it as creative nonfiction, and how the editor's note clarifies it's based on reporting rather than a single true family's story—aimed at informing readers and prompting reflection on vaccination decisions despite mixed reader reactions.
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
8
Time Saved
10 min
vs 11 min read
Condensed
96%
2,127 → 76 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Nieman Lab