Grammarly Accused of Using Journalists' Names in AI Tool, Faces Class Action

TL;DR Summary
Grammarly’s AI editing feature Expert Review allegedly used the names of journalists and other writers as “inspiration” without their consent, triggering a class-action suit that references figures like Julia Angwin and Stephen King. The feature was pulled the same day the suit was filed; plaintiffs argue the use violates California’s right-of-publicity laws and seek damages with the amount in controversy over $5 million, though no specific sum is demanded. Grammarly CEO Shishir Mehrotra apologized and said the feature was disabled while the company assesses the impact.
Topics:business#artificial-intelligence#class-action#grammarly#journalists#right-of-publicity#technology
- Grammarly Allegedly ‘Misappropriated’ Names of Journalists, Says Class Action Suit Gizmodo
- What Was Grammarly Thinking? The Atlantic
- Grammarly Is Facing a Class Action Lawsuit Over Its AI ‘Expert Review’ Feature WIRED
- Grammarly is using our identities without permission The Verge
- Grammarly pulls AI tool mimicking Stephen King and other writers BBC
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
2
Time Saved
15 min
vs 16 min read
Condensed
97%
3,072 → 86 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Gizmodo