"Controversial Proposal: Limiting Retirement Tax Breaks to Strengthen Social Security"

TL;DR Summary
A controversial proposal by economists Andrew Biggs and Alicia Munnell suggests limiting tax perks for retirement savings plans to bolster Social Security's funding gap, sparking opposition from critics who argue that removing tax benefits would discourage saving. The proposal aims to redirect funds from retirement plans to shore up Social Security, providing immediate funding while allowing time for lawmakers to consider other changes. Despite pushback, both economists stand by their stance, emphasizing the need to reevaluate the impact of tax preferences on retirement saving behavior.
Topics:business#bipartisan-proposal#retirement-planning#retirement-plans#retirement-savings#social-security#tax-incentives
- To shore up Social Security, this controversial proposal calls for limiting retirement plan tax perks CNBC
- 401(k) and IRA retirement tax breaks don't benefit many Americans USA TODAY
- Don’t Gut Private Savings to Save Social Security National Review
- Economists call for 401(K) tax benefits to be axed Daily Mail
- Industry attacks proposal to bolster Social Security by eliminating 401(k) tax deferrals Pensions & Investments
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
2
Time Saved
4 min
vs 5 min read
Condensed
90%
882 → 85 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on CNBC