All articles tagged with #legal strategy
Donald Trump has formally appealed his 2024 criminal conviction in Manhattan, claiming the trial was flawed due to juror misconduct and judicial errors, as he seeks to overturn 34 felony convictions related to falsifying business records to conceal hush-money payments made during the 2016 election.
The article criticizes Trump and Stephen Miller for using a strategy of filing weak, likely unsuccessful legal cases against their enemies, aiming to overwhelm and discredit opponents through repeated, groundless investigations and prosecutions.
Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team is employing multiple strategies, including appealing to the Supreme Court, seeking clemency, and discussing Epstein-related crimes with prosecutors, in an effort to secure her release from prison. While these tactics may be aimed at gaining her freedom, skepticism remains about her willingness to reveal the full truth, with experts suggesting her actions are primarily motivated by self-interest rather than a desire for transparency.
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs received a standing ovation from inmates after his legal team successfully secured acquittals on serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering, though he remains jailed on prostitution-related charges and faces sentencing. His defense highlighted a strategic approach that emphasized the distinction between his personal life and criminal conduct, leading to a significant legal victory and a morale boost for Combs and his supporters.
Sean 'Diddy' Combs received a standing ovation from inmates after winning acquittals on serious charges, highlighting a significant legal victory that resonated with the incarcerated community, despite his ongoing legal issues and potential sentencing.
The Trump administration has avoided appealing several court rulings blocking its executive orders, instead using intimidation tactics to coerce major law firms into providing nearly $1 billion in pro bono services and settling cases, a strategy seen as effective but controversial and potentially unconstitutional.
The trial of Daniel Penny highlights the importance of courtroom dynamics and the impact of key moments during proceedings, which may influence the outcome as much as the evidence presented. This case underscores how legal strategies and the presentation of evidence can shape the trial's direction and verdict.
The Biden administration is reportedly considering preemptive pardons for individuals who might be targeted by Donald Trump if he regains the presidency. This unprecedented move reflects concerns that Trump could pursue legal action against perceived enemies, including former officials and investigators. Discussions are being led by White House counsel Ed Siskel, with potential legal aid and funds also being considered for those who might face prosecution. Trump's team views this as setting a new precedent, potentially allowing Trump to issue similar pardons for his allies.
Donald Trump is attempting to leverage President Joe Biden's pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, to dismiss his own conviction in the Manhattan hush money case. Trump's lawyers argue that Biden's comments on selective prosecution apply to Trump's situation, claiming political bias in his prosecution. The case, handled by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, resulted in Trump's conviction on 34 felony counts. Trump's legal team contends that continuing the case would impede his presidential transition and be undemocratic. Bragg's office is expected to respond to these arguments next week.
NewJeans announced the termination of their contract with ADOR, citing breaches by the label and stating they are not liable for penalty fees. This move, which bypasses the usual legal injunction process, has sparked mixed reactions. Some legal experts support NewJeans' strategy as smart, while public opinion is divided, with some viewing the decision as impulsive and others as justified. The situation now requires ADOR to take legal action if they wish to contest the termination.
Special counsel Jack Smith has filed motions to dismiss the Jan. 6 election interference and government documents cases against Donald Trump, citing the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel's opinion that a sitting president cannot be indicted. By dismissing the cases "without prejudice," Smith aims to preserve the possibility of refiling charges after Trump's presidency, while preventing Trump's future attorney general from dismissing them permanently. This strategic move keeps the cases alive for potential future prosecution, despite the current legal limitations.
Internal rivalries within Donald Trump's camp have surfaced as top adviser Boris Epshteyn faces an ouster effort over allegations of soliciting consulting fees from potential administration nominees. Despite a review recommending his termination, Epshteyn remains in Trump's inner circle, credited with helping Trump sidestep legal challenges. The situation highlights the return of the contentious atmosphere from Trump's first presidency, with Epshteyn's influence both questioned and defended by different factions within Trump's team.
Following Donald Trump's election, his New York criminal case has been paused to determine the next steps, while other federal and state cases against him are delayed or dismissed. Trump's legal strategy to prolong proceedings has largely succeeded, with the New York case being the only one still active. The federal election and documents cases are expected to be dropped due to presidential immunity, and the Georgia case is postponed. Civil cases against Trump remain unaffected by his election.
Former President Donald Trump's legal strategy to delay his criminal cases has largely succeeded, with most charges against him either dismissed or postponed. His New York conviction remains, but sentencing has been delayed. Trump's election as president has led to the suspension or potential dismissal of federal cases, citing presidential immunity. Civil cases against him, however, will proceed. Trump's legal maneuvers and potential retaliatory actions against those involved in his cases remain a point of concern.
Special counsel Jack Smith has requested that federal District Judge Tanya Chutkan remove all upcoming deadlines in Donald Trump's criminal case related to the 2020 election. This move is to allow Smith's office to reassess their strategy as Trump potentially returns to the presidency. CNN's Elie Honig discusses the implications of Smith's decision.