All articles tagged with #john durham
Originally Published 3 months ago — by ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
Former special counsel John Durham told prosecutors he found no evidence to support charges against James Comey, leading to a conclusion that Comey did not lie or obstruct justice, despite some prosecutors seeking indictment. The case remains politically charged, with differing opinions on Comey's actions and the investigation's findings.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by POLITICO
Nora Dannehy, a former federal prosecutor who worked on the Trump-Russia probe, revealed during her confirmation hearing for the state Supreme Court that she resigned from the investigation due to concerns with then-Attorney General William Barr's public comments about the case and her disagreement with a draft of an interim report he considered releasing before the election. Dannehy stated that she believed Barr's comments violated DOJ guidelines and that she had concerns about the investigation's objectivity. The probe, overseen by former special counsel John Durham, concluded with underwhelming results, leading to a strained relationship between Barr and former President Trump.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by Yahoo News
Legal experts claim that special counsel John Durham made false statements while testifying before the House Judiciary Committee about the FBI's probe into the Trump campaign's alleged collusion with Russia during the 2016 election. Durham's report on the FBI's inquiry was released last month after four years of investigation and notably did not produce any evidence backing former President Donald Trump and his allies' claims that the bureau's investigation was an elaborate hoax concocted by opponents in the Deep State.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by KATU
Special Counsel John Durham testified before the House Judiciary Committee, shedding light on the FBI's behavior during the Trump-Russia probe. Durham recently completed his report on the investigation of Trump's 2016 campaign.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by POLITICO
Special Counsel John Durham testified before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday regarding his report on the FBI investigation of collusion between Russian officials and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. Democrats and Republicans sparred over the report, with Democrats accusing Durham of constructing a flimsy story built on shaky inferences and dog whistles to far-right conspiracy theorists, while Republicans called for reforms to the FBI and accused the investigation of being politically motivated. Durham stood by the findings of the report and defended himself from Democratic criticism.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by The Daily Beast
During a hearing at the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff questioned Special Counsel John Durham about whether President Trump flaunted information that was released by Russian hackers during the 2016 election. Durham admitted that Russia helped Trump during the election, something many Republicans have denied. Schiff also compared Durham and Mueller's investigations, pointing out that Mueller refused to bring charges where he couldn't prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, while Durham brought three charges forward, went to trial with two, and won convictions on zero.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by Yahoo News
During a hearing at the House Judiciary Committee, Special Counsel John Durham admitted that Russia helped the Trump campaign during the 2016 election. Rep. Adam Schiff questioned Durham about whether President Trump flaunted information that was released by Russian hackers during the election, to which Durham repeatedly insisted he had no knowledge of the matter. However, Durham agreed that the Russians had been helpful to the Trump campaign. Schiff also compared Durham and Mueller's investigations, stating that the only distinguishing thing between them was that Mueller refused to bring charges where he couldn't prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, while Durham did.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by USA TODAY
Republicans and Democrats clashed over the political implications of special counsel John Durham's report on the origins of the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Republicans criticized flaws in the FBI and Justice Department conduct, while Democrats highlighted the lack of convictions from Durham's investigation. Both sides kept an eye on the 2024 presidential campaign, with Democrats accusing Republicans of distracting from Trump's legal troubles and Republicans arguing that the FBI and DOJ have been turned into active political weapons against citizens. The hearing had rare moments of levity, with Durham jokingly disagreeing with Trump's description of Bill Barr as a "gutless pig" and a "coward."
Originally Published 2 years ago — by The Daily Beast
During a hearing with the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) attempted to embarrass special counsel John Durham by questioning his limited credentials and the length and cost of his investigation into the FBI's probe into possible collusion between Russia and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. Durham defended his work and suggested reforms to the FBI and Department of Justice, but faced tense interactions with Democrats, including Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN).
Originally Published 2 years ago — by The Associated Press
House Republicans are using the report of John Durham, who recently completed his report on the FBI’s investigation of Trump’s 2016 campaign, to renew their argument that federal law enforcement is tainted by political bias. Durham will testify before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. Republicans who control the House say they’re still angry about the 2016 campaign probe, known as “Crossfire Hurricane,” and intend to push new curbs on the FBI in exchange for renewing surveillance powers known as Section 702 that U.S. intelligence considers critical and that expire at the end of this year.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by CBS News
John Durham, the special counsel who investigated the FBI's probe into possible links between Russia and former President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, testified before Congress twice this week. Durham's report, released in May, was critical of the FBI, saying agents showed "confirmation bias" and finding that the basis for opening an investigation into whether Trump's campaign was coordinating with Russia in 2016 was "seriously flawed." Durham recommended in his report a career official be assigned to challenge the FBI's politically sensitive surveillance applications.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by CNN
Special counsel John Durham testified behind closed doors to the House Intelligence Committee on Tuesday, stating that he believes reforms are needed at the FBI and for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Durham is set to testify publicly Wednesday before the House Judiciary Committee regarding the details of his report that concluded that the FBI should never have launched a full investigation into connections between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia during the 2016 election. Durham's report did not recommend any new charges against individuals or "wholesale changes" about how the FBI handles politically charged investigations, despite strongly criticizing the agency's behavior.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by POLITICO
House Intelligence Committee Chair Mike Turner hopes that special counsel John Durham's upcoming testimony will reveal government misconduct in the FBI's probe of possible links between Russia and former President Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign. Turner wants to ensure accountability in investigative processes and prevent political bias from entering into political campaigns and using the authority of the government to have major media and the government take actions that are not based on truth. Durham is set to provide closed-door testimony to Turner's panel on Tuesday.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by NBC News
Former special counsel John Durham will testify before the House Judiciary Committee on June 21 about his probe into the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation. Durham's four-year investigation concluded that the FBI inappropriately launched a full investigation into the allegations, but stopped short of providing any new evidence that anyone in the government had broken the law. Republicans have used Durham's report to make the case that the probe into Russia and its ties to then-candidate Donald Trump were politically motivated and based on a faulty premise, while House Democrats have charged that the Durham report itself is politically motivated.
Originally Published 2 years ago — by New York Post
Special counsel John Durham will testify before the House Judiciary Committee on June 21 to discuss his final report on the FBI's investigation into claims of Russian collusion by former President Donald Trump. Durham's report found that the FBI's probe was "seriously flawed" and that officials demonstrated a "pattern of assuming nefarious intent." The report also noted the role of 2016 Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in circulating allegations of a Trump-Russia conspiracy. Durham is likely to face criticism from both Republicans and Democrats during his testimony.