Unveiling the Truth: Bias and Exaggeration in Ecology
A study in the field of ecology has found empirical evidence of widespread exaggeration bias and selective reporting, highlighting concerns about the reproducibility of research findings in the discipline. The study examined the prevalence of these biases in ecological research and their potential impact on effect sizes, statistical power, and the occurrence of type M (magnitude) and type S (sign) errors. The findings suggest that publication bias and the pressure to report statistically significant results may contribute to the exaggeration of effect sizes and the suppression of non-significant findings. The study emphasizes the need for transparency, reproducibility, and improved statistical reporting practices in ecology to ensure the credibility and reliability of research findings.