"Climate Impact: Paper Books vs. E-Readers"

1 min read
Source: NPR
"Climate Impact: Paper Books vs. E-Readers"
Photo: NPR
TL;DR Summary

The environmental impact of reading via paper books versus e-readers is complex, with each having pros and cons. Traditional print publishing has a high carbon footprint due to paper production and unsold book waste, while e-readers save trees but have significant manufacturing emissions. The best choice depends on reading habits, with e-readers being more eco-friendly for avid readers. Overall, reading remains a relatively sustainable activity.

Share this article

Reading Insights

Total Reads

0

Unique Readers

1

Time Saved

4 min

vs 5 min read

Condensed

93%

87465 words

Want the full story? Read the original article

Read on NPR