Google and Epic Games Clash in High-Stakes Trial Over App Store Fees

In the Epic vs Google trial, Google defended its 30% cut of all transactions on its Play store, describing it as a "market fee" rather than a monopoly fee. Google argued that other stores, such as Nintendo, Xbox, and Steam, charge the same fee to mega developers like Epic. However, Epic Games Store head Steve Allison testified that the 30% fee is not the standard, citing examples of different revenue shares in the industry. The impact of the fee was also discussed, with a witness stating that Google's policies resulted in fewer users paying for an app. Additionally, Allison revealed that the Epic Games Store is still not profitable. The trial centers around Epic's claims of anti-competitive practices by Google, including the 30% fee and anti-steering policies.
- 30% is "a market fee, not a monopoly fee," says Google | Epic vs Google GamesIndustry.biz
- Google and Epic Games face off at trial over Play Store rules | World DNA | WION WION
- 5 years after trying for a 'Valve-Counterstrike moment' with Fortnite, the Epic Games Store still isn't turning a profit PC Gamer
- The Epic v. Google trial may come down to simple v. complicated The Verge
- Google's 'Project Hug' Cast by Epic as App Market Power Crusade Bloomberg
Reading Insights
0
0
3 min
vs 4 min read
80%
643 → 127 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on GamesIndustry.biz