"Judges Skeptical of Trump's Immunity Claim in Court Hearing"

TL;DR Summary
Three federal appeals court judges appeared to lean toward rejecting Donald Trump's claim of immunity from criminal charges related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The judges expressed skepticism about the legal reasoning behind Trump's argument that presidents cannot be prosecuted for actions taken in office, with one judge stating that it was paradoxical to suggest that a president's duty to execute laws allows them to violate criminal laws. Trump's lawyer's assertion that the only way to hold a president accountable for crimes was through impeachment proceedings was also met with skepticism by the court.
Topics:top-news#criminal-charges#donald-trump#election-subversion#federal-appeals-court#legal-immunity#politics
- Judges Lean Toward Rejecting Trump’s Immunity Claim in Court The New York Times
- Takeaways from the appeals court hearing on Donald Trump’s immunity claims CNN
- The coming Trump constitutional crisis — and how to avoid it The Hill
- Judges “did not buy” Trump arguments on immunity MSNBC
- Live updates: Trump lawyers argue that the former president is immune from prosecution CNN
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
1 min
vs 2 min read
Condensed
60%
244 → 97 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The New York Times