Supreme Court Leans Toward Preserving Access to Abortion Drug Mifepristone

TL;DR Summary
The Supreme Court seemed disinterested during oral arguments in the case seeking to ban the abortion drug mifepristone, with most justices focusing on the question of whether any federal judge had jurisdiction to hear the case. The plaintiffs, anti-abortion doctors and organizations, argue that they have standing to restrict access to mifepristone due to potential future injuries, but the justices expressed skepticism about their standing theory. The Court's decision could determine whether the meritless lawsuit continues for years, potentially being repeatedly revived by a judge determined to ban abortions, or whether the case will be put to bed forever.
Topics:top-news#abortion-pills#alliance-for-hippocratic-medicine#fda#jurisdictional-grounds#law-and-politics#supreme-court
- The Supreme Court seems sick of arguing about the abortion drug mifepristone Vox.com
- Most Supreme Court Justices Seem Skeptical of Effort to Curtail Abortion Pill Access The New York Times
- Supreme Court appears inclined to preserve broad access to abortion drug Fox News
- US supreme court seems skeptical of arguments against abortion drug mifepristone The Guardian
- Ketanji Brown Jackson Dunks on Alito During Abortion Hearing The Daily Beast
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
0
Time Saved
8 min
vs 9 min read
Condensed
94%
1,676 → 99 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Vox.com