Vincke Suggests Reviewing Reviewers, Igniting Gaming-Press Debate

TL;DR Summary
Larian CEO Swen Vincke floated the idea of a system to evaluate and review the reviewers themselves, aiming to curb bias and improve accountability in game criticism. The notion sparked a wide online debate about fairness, transparency, and practicality, with supporters arguing for improved scrutiny of outlets and individual critics, while opponents warn of potential abuse, censorship, and the erosion of independent voices. The discussion also touches on existing dynamics like Metacritic weighting, free review codes, and the difficulty of measuring subjective art.
- Larian CEO Swen Vincke Sticks His Foot in It Again, Thinks Game Reviewers Should Also Be Reviewed Push Square
- High-profile developers rally behind Highguard amid harsh launch criticism: “The harsh words do real damage” Diario AS
- Baldur's Gate 3 studio boss calls out "hurtful", "personal" videogame reviewers - "sometimes I think it'd be a good idea for critics to be scored, Metacritic-style" Rock Paper Shotgun
- Baldur's Gate 3 Boss Calls For Civility As Highguard Gets Savaged Kotaku
- Baldur’s Gate 3 lead says all art “deserves respect” as Highguard gets torn apart by gamers and critics alike FRVR
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
8
Time Saved
46 min
vs 47 min read
Condensed
99%
9,215 → 83 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Push Square