"Supreme Court's Impact on Federal Agency Power: A Small Fish, Big Implications"

TL;DR Summary
The US Supreme Court heard arguments in a case involving a government program to monitor overfishing of herring, which could limit the regulatory powers of federal agencies. The case involves two fishing companies challenging the National Marine Fisheries Service's authority to require commercial fishermen to fund the program. The conservative majority on the court expressed skepticism towards the Chevron deference doctrine, which calls for judges to defer to federal agency interpretation of ambiguous US laws. The case is part of a broader effort to weaken federal agency bureaucracy, and rulings are expected by the end of June.
Topics:nation#chevron-deference#environmental-regulation#federal-agencies#overfishing#us-supreme-court#us-supreme-court-federal-agencies-environmental-regulation
- Supreme court hears key case that could strangle power of US federal agencies The Guardian US
- How a case involving a small fish could have big implications on federal regulations PBS NewsHour
- Episode 1078: What federal rulemaking power has to do with the economy Marketplace
- The Supreme Court ruled against me to empower federal agencies. They got it right. The Hill
- The Supreme Court Might Rein In the Administrative State - Opinion: Potomac Watch - WSJ Podcasts The Wall Street Journal
Reading Insights
Total Reads
0
Unique Readers
1
Time Saved
3 min
vs 4 min read
Condensed
86%
680 → 97 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Guardian US