"Trump's Presidential Bid Amid Conviction: Legal and Historical Insights"
TL;DR Summary
In the New York trial against Donald Trump, closing arguments were presented with the defense focusing on discrediting key witness Michael Cohen and arguing that Trump had no intent to defraud or influence the 2016 election. The prosecution countered by emphasizing the corroborative evidence and the testimonies of other witnesses, asserting that Trump falsified business records to cover up election law violations. The jury will now deliberate based on the evidence and arguments presented.
- From Arguments to Instructions Hard National Security Choices
- Can Trump run for president as a convicted felon? BBC.com
- Donald Trump found guilty in historic New York hush money case NBC News
- Recapping the Trump hush money charges, trial, verdict and questions CNN
- Running for US president from prison? Eugene V. Debs did it, a century ago The Associated Press
Reading Insights
Total Reads
1
Unique Readers
3
Time Saved
91 min
vs 92 min read
Condensed
100%
18,290 → 74 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on Hard National Security Choices