The Costly and Controversial Practice of Electing Judges in the US

The Wisconsin supreme court race, the most expensive state supreme court election in US history, has raised questions about why partisan groups are allowed to get involved in the selection of supposedly nonpartisan judges and why judges are directly elected at all. Thirty-eight states elect the people who sit on their highest courts in some way, and judges often have the last word on major policy decisions in their states. While some states have moved towards merit selections, the vast majority of state judges are still selected through judicial elections. The increased political spending in these races has led to concerns about the influence of money on judicial election campaigns and the potential impact on how judges rule once elected to the bench.
- The $37m question: why do US states elect judges in expensive, partisan elections? The Guardian US
- Wisconsin's Supreme Court Race Is the Next Abortion-Rights Test The Cut
- Medical malpractice in Wisconsin: Could Supreme Court election change precedent? Channel3000.com - WISC-TV3
- Opinion | Wisconsin Supreme Court race shows why judges shouldn't be elected The Washington Post
- Wis. Supreme Court candidates share their philosophies and respond to attacks in one-on-one interviews WMTV – NBC15
Reading Insights
0
1
6 min
vs 7 min read
90%
1,252 → 123 words
Want the full story? Read the original article
Read on The Guardian US